Attn Alecta PvP Resists and Level Range

[Shocker]

How you play makes a difference but discs/better spells/and gear do play a part too . Welcome to EQ bros.

[SamwiseRed]

Originally Posted by Legend [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

sam wants sz rulset but cant handle vt/tz ruleset

shut up sam shut the fuck up and stop crying I wish you would quit again for the 3rd time

vztz was a teams server ya moran. totally different than ffa.

you are probably against item loot too huh?

[SamwiseRed]

item loot and 4 level range is 2 giant steps towards classic which is why we are here in the first place right?

im not against no level range but it just doenst work with the ffa ruleset.

[Potus]

Item Loot isn't classic. It lasted for a very brief time and was removed because of how crappy it was.

I don't get why everyone wants item loot, it'd be terrible on a server like this (think who has all the No Drop gear).

[Legend]

I played on rallos for a year with item loot

my first pvp server

with 60 avg pop, im pretty sure everyone would be a caster naked. I know I wouldn't dare roll a melle with item loot no way no thanks

i look forward to this item loot caster only server with 30 players on it

item loot was so bad, bagging was bad, if item loot let you loot through bags sure...

hell if were so hardcore why not make a discord server

promote healthy pvp anyways this shits dead and like the 55 other active players here i think red99 is slowly helping me cure my 15 year long everquest addiction, like masturbation its lost its fun

[Dullah]

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ya a 52 wizard vs a 60 wizard is an even match up. same goes for any other 52 vs 60.
double backstabbing lvl 60 rogue with duelest disc is on a level playing field with a 52 rogue of same gear without any discs.

better spells, discs, ect dont matta.

surprised you would be against this. you seem to be all about classic unless it infringes on something you can take advantage of.

edit:



you make a pvp bug posts about nerfing/buffing discs then tell me levels dont matter. okay.... not sure if srs or dum.

The context was resists. Levels don't mean shit in pvp on r99 as far as resists are concerned. Of course they mean something as far as getting better spells and abilities. Theres no reason to change the level range based on spell resists.

All the pvp servers had different rulesets and ranges, so claiming the server isn't classic on grounds that it doesn't follow rallos zek specifically doesn't hold water.

I personally like a larger range, and frankly think levels should play more of a part of spells landing or being resisted.

You just want to play EQ with as little risk involved as possible.

[SamwiseRed]

Originally Posted by Dullah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You just want to play EQ with as little risk involved as possible.

uh there is no risk here lol. no item loot, no xp loss. not sure what risk you are speaking of. what i want is a chance for new players to level up without being shit on by bored 60, make fights a little more balanced and fair. allow new guilds to progress like you guys had a chance too. i am asking for a classic mechanic for this server under this ffa ruleset.

what i want honestly is a sullon zek clone. i hate ffa but if we are gonna play on a shitty ruleset at least make it make sense.

[Aenor]

In one of my epic teams ruleset threads I suggested +/-6 for teams. PvP is clearly not competitive at an 8 lvl difference, but +/- 4 is too narrow a range and blubifies a server. Six levels would be a good compromise imo. GJ all those who are trying to fix the current server but I personally don't care. Teams or retire.