![]() |
#81
|
|||
|
![]() Seb AE pulls I participated in was around 40-50 mobs max
Was the ramp down to disco1 and everything at D1 to Frenzied Scarab fought in Scarab room prob was less than 50 but exciting- Cleric, Bard, Wiz, Wiz, Ench , Ench - Cleric pulls it w DAs n we all run down together cleric leading
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
| ||
|
#82
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Try doing this on a dial up connection where it is how most connect to the game back then. | |||
|
#83
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#85
|
|||
|
![]() Anyone who has been a part of one of these 130 mob pulls and seen how they die knows this is not how EQ was meant to be played. Its not even up for debate, this is an exploit and an obvious exploit at that.
I've made the same argument before and no one ever has anything to say to it. Back on live I remember there was a guild who figured out how to duplicate platinum on Fennin Ro. Was this exploit left in P99? Shits classic right? No it wasn't, because it was deemed detrimental to the game - JUST LIKE F#CKING CHARDOK IS. EDIT: I would have much less of a problem with Chardok AoE if you couldn't pull the ENTIRE zone to the entrance in 1 pull. If you had to do it in many smaller pulls, that would be classic | ||
|
#86
|
|||
|
![]() Duplicating plat IS an exploit. you are duplicating items that are not there...
pulling existing mobs to a specific spot in the zone is NOT an exploit. if you still think this is an exploit, why is YOUR guild pulling named dragons to the ToV zone in and training all the other KoS mobs into WToV preventing everyone else who happens to zone in to get owned by some big ass dragon, and unable to try to zone out by running through WToV because you guys trained 50+ KoS mobs into a wing that is supposed to be non KoS? is this a big issue in chardok? no not really because no one but AE groups usually use the zone. is this a huge problem in ToV where there is high player traffic? you bet yer ass it is, with the shit you are pulling there you are actively disrupting other players/guilds that try to do something there from doing anything at all. Can we prevent it by setting up somewhere in between the zone in and the mob you are trying to pull? yes we can, and oh wait... we did a few weeks ago, and you guys STILL pulled the dragon through our camp training the shit out of us (still have it on fraps btw if you wanna see proof of it) then having the dragon gate, training us with the returning train you pulled, and a dragon again going through our camp wiping us as we were on CR. see the big difference there? one zone that no one uses (and if they do, the AE groups i have been on accommodate that group for royals for example) where as ToV that is highly contested gets trained to no avail. big big difference there. so you think one is an exploit, but you actively participate in the other because it suits your needs? | ||
|
#87
|
|||
|
![]() Lets get some pug groups going in Chardok. Have your favorite video recording software ready. Cya soon!
| ||
|
#88
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
I have spent a significant amount of time at Chardok, I am not saying I have never done it. What I am saying is it should be stopped because it is the most non-classic thing this server has going on at the moment. | |||
|
#89
|
|||
|
![]() Yay another thread about people expressing their disdain for Chardok AOE groups. It seems to have been very effective in the past. Will check back in 2 years to see what progress has been made.
__________________
Idol 60 Dark Elf Necromancer
Kombat 47 Wood Elf Rogue Juvenile 38 Iksar Shadow Knight | ||
|
#90
|
|||||||||||
|
![]() AoE Guide Posts from Graffe's forums: 2001/2002
Pre-Chardok Revamp AoE from June 2001: http://www.graffe.com/forums/showthr...hlight=chardok Quote:
http://www.graffe.com/forums/showthr...hlight=chardok Quote:
Post-Chardok Revamp, Pre-Luclin Thread: http://www.graffe.com/forums/showthr...-for-Sorcerers Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Post-Chardok Revamp/Luclin Thread: http://www.graffe.com/forums/showthread.php?6083/page& Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
|