Question for GMs: Forward LNS

[heartbrand]

This Akalaka poster is awful. Is it that weird tranny azure dude?

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i thought it was clear. as HC is suspended from fear, they have no grounds to lay claim to that zone, nor do they have grounds to dictate whom may enter that zone.

better?

also, you literally logged out last night as i tried to send you a tell. was very rude.

That doesn't answer in normal practice whether "Forward" LNS'ing is acceptable or not.

[Akalakamelee]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He saw an ugly guy with messed up teeth and assumed African American. Got to be a racist. I mean for reals.

Nah, I'm not ignorant. Using my phone and the pic was small, upon zooming I saw the mistake. I can admit when I'm wrong, your turn guys.

[Akalakamelee]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This Akalaka poster is awful. Is it that weird tranny azure dude?

Who's azure? I don't keep records of every eq player and constantly dwell on the past of r99 like you do pal.

[Kergan]

Originally Posted by Akalakamelee [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It wasn't the lns violation that made me dislike holo so much, it was the childish response that came of it and the barrage of personal attacks that came from the forums, in which you also joined in on it.

Prior to petitioning I did ask if holo officers were on, I would have been ok with settling it between myself and your officer instead of having gm involvement. The reply I got was "HOLOCAUST RECRUITING". Don't bitch about petitionquest, we could have settled.

I haven't even played in 4 months, and haven't been in Holo since it was like 15 people right after Nihilum was disbanded. I know it may be easier for you to generalize everyone that thinks you're a weird pedo and crybaby into one guild though so proceed.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That doesn't answer in normal practice whether "Forward" LNS'ing is acceptable or not.

In large scale PvP there is no limit to the number of zones a force can be locked out of. If a fight took place across multiple zones the lockout will apply to all zones a PvP related death occurred in.

[Akalakamelee]

Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I haven't even played in 4 months, and haven't been in Holo since it was like 15 people right after Nihilum was disbanded. I know it may be easier for you to generalize everyone that thinks you're a weird pedo and crybaby into one guild though so proceed.

Seems you frequently swing on their testies. You don't even play, why do you care?

[Kergan]

Because ForumQuest?

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so is it okay to forward LNS into a raid zone that's being blocked off?

Fresh was there and was zoning in periodically with PvP taking place inside Fear

if it was 3 guilds doing 1v1v1 against each other, then Fresh could have forced Azrael out. but as Fresh and Holocaust were clearly working in a 2v1, i considered them as part of the same force. and i simply was not going to let the efforts of a guild that was suspended from Fear dictate anything having to do with control of the zone.

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In large scale PvP there is no limit to the number of zones a force can be locked out of. If a fight took place across multiple zones the lockout will apply to all zones a PvP related death occurred in.

Sirk can I get a legit question answered about force LnS?

If a guild has 6 people in CT and 6 are in Feerot pvping a force of the same size at the same time in both zones. Is that considered a "Force" and should it fall under the "Force LnS" rules?