I ninja looted and I'm sorry Judoku / Safe Space

[honloro]

This probably sounds like bs because I definitely should have known better. But I feel bad because I'm sure I ruined a few people's days and not sure how else to describe my behavior and apologize.

Hondara (my druid) ported in to Iceclad, saw a corpse, took everything and scooted. It was lodizal's corpse. I didn't realize it was a significant mob that took a high end team to kill. I should have known better.

I realized my mistake when ooc started blowing up so I began looking for whether the no drop piece could be mq'd... but a GM showed up quick and asked me to destroy what I looted, which I did.

Unfortunately the map piece belonged to Judoku and they didn't get it because of me. It sucks I did that to someone. I'm really not trying to ruin anybody else's everquest experience, but I was foolish and didn't think and I'm sorry Judoku.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

I believe judoku will get reimbursed if a GM got involved. That's why they have you delete the item, so they can grant it to the other user instead.

Thanks for posting a sorry!

[Reiwa]

No plunderin in these waters, matey. Yarr.

[honloro]

Thinking on this I realize that my apology was incomplete.

I ninja looted and subsequently destroyed the map piece as well as three spells. Apologies to Judoku as well as whoever the rightful owners of those spells were. And to Safe Space and to the GM whose time I wasted. I hope you are indeed reimbursed but either way I effed up.

I didn't intend to cause grief, and I'm far from a criminal mastermind, I'm a regretful idiot and I'm sorry that my lesson came at your expense.

[kjs86z2]

There's no way you looted Lodi without knowing what it was lol.

[WarpathEQ]

Typically when a GM gets involved it leads to a lose/lose outcome. Item gets deleted and server/intended looter get screwed. There are multiple layers to reimbursement such as being able to prove what loot was on the mob and the looter being on the actual engage encounter that often times are not able to be met if someone were to seek reimbursement after the fact.

[cd288]

Typically when a GM gets involved it leads to a lose/lose outcome. Item gets deleted and server/intended looter get screwed. There are multiple layers to reimbursement such as being able to prove what loot was on the mob and the looter being on the actual engage encounter that often times are not able to be met if someone were to seek reimbursement after the fact.

Since when? You just check the log to see what the mob dropped. If it's killed by a guild, the guild can let the GM know who in the guild was going to be eligible to loot each item. IIRC they don't need to be on the encounter log if they are part of the guild, as guilds allow alts to spend DKP to loot.

[Mcolaluca]

Believe it or not, there are actually some people new to this game.
My wife wasnt aware for raid loot worked and didnt understand why she couldnt loot all the items on a raid boss

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Believe it or not, there are actually some people new to this game.
My wife wasnt aware for raid loot worked and didnt understand why she couldnt loot all the items on a raid boss

Indeed. A veteran player would know better than to ninja loot lodi. When was the last time someone got away with ninja looting? The devs have server logs.

[azeth]

Join date 2022.

Liar.

Suspension.

[Swish]

Typically

Petitions are handled on a case by case basis. There's no certainty. The lawyers out there would love to cite "Soandso vs P99staff 2013" if they could (lol)

[Reiwa]

Petitions are handled on a case by case basis. There's no certainty. The lawyers out there would love to cite "Soandso vs P99staff 2013" if they could (lol)

I know you only recently got a court but it would cut down on petitions or make them faster to deal with if they followed stare decisis.

Sorry you got.

[Cecily]

https://youtu.be/aSt1J_usLzQ&t=224