will exp on r99 be like p1999

Sniperfire · #1 08-30-2011, 09:27 AM

are you goin to make us grind like dogs? this will hurt server pop

**nilbog** · #2 08-30-2011, 09:38 AM

Hurting server population no longer has any validity for me.

That rationale, with nothing to back it up, has been overused.

Mrcurtloco · #3 08-30-2011, 09:38 AM

I heard only gay rangers are p99 exp, rest is x300%

it does nil actually ask dax ask null ask searyx

but to find the happy medium is the key

ive grinded threw 5 pvp boxes, it does get old to people.

but to be fair if its a server with not 3... not 4.. not5. not6 not7, no but without 300 plus pop or maybe even more, low exp can be killer for pvpers

mitic · #4 08-30-2011, 10:12 AM

best pvp is while exping. reduce exp on red99 even more imo!

Nirgon · #5 08-30-2011, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hurting server population no longer has any validity for me.

That rationale, with nothing to back it up, has been overused.

Classic xp. Makes the lower levels and class struggle matter.

Macken · #6 08-30-2011, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hurting server population no longer has any validity for me.

With all the "rules" presumably to protect red99 population,(yt etc..) i guess the staff meetings are pretty unbearable for you then?

zixxer · #7 08-30-2011, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

best pvp is while exping. reduce exp on red99 even more imo!

Agree

Doors · #8 08-30-2011, 10:43 AM

Keep exp rates the same, ditch the class penalties imo.

**nilbog** · #9 08-30-2011, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With all the "rules" presumably to protect red99 population,(yt etc..) i guess the staff meetings are pretty unbearable for you then?

You presume too much and your guess is wrong.

Macken · #10 08-30-2011, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You presume too much and your guess is wrong.

So all these dumb oppresive rules like no yt, staff-suggested play nice rules etc... are not to protect server population according to nilbog.

Maybe nilbog wants to elaborate?

So while you are convinced there are is nothing to back up the arguement that rules or no yt have any postive effect on population, you sit through meetings keeping your mouth shut about the most important thing effecting the hypothetical new red server?