#1
|
|||
|
there is 1000 people on blue and 90 on red
Come-on guys.
We can do this. | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
im aiming for 50 or less primetime. need one more fungi twink for the 45-50 range and no one will be safe
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Only 42k on spreadsheetz
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Probably 100 are ec mules, another 200 inactive sub level 5s. Then a ton of sub 50 casuals running around trying to exp and play nice while maybe 2 to 300 tops poo sick spawns non stop. Maybe throw up a extra hundred for trackers that are 99.8% idle too. All you're left with is a decent amount of grps with casual exp
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Nope 1k players at the keyboard. I personally counted.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
So basically only 90 people actually playing Everquest
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
blue legitimately feels more dead than red even when there's 2000 people on, fucking place feels like a graveyard of afk farmers trackers EC bots and twinks who don't want to group with you.
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Play Phinigel, it's got 5 or so months before Cats on the Moon is released, so you can have fun in a semi-classic server where poop-socking and full zones aren't a factor due to dungeon instances.
No zone is left empty and no zone is overcamped!
__________________
Drakar 60 Iksar Necromancer
Skar 60 Iksar Shadowknight | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Gobble?
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I don't like current eq live, I quit near the end of planes of power. All those new changes and interface stuff, augments and modifiers are weird. AAs are great though esp general and some class specific
| ||
|
|
|