![]() |
|
View Poll Results: rate my signature ![]() |
|||
fun |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
hot |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 5.88% |
cute |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 17.65% |
cool |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 47.06% |
ugly |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 5.88% |
stupid |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 23.53% |
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() i think its fresh as hell
__________________
![]() | ||
#2
|
|||
|
![]() Feels pretty classic, but the name princess is intrinsically annoying so I'm going to give it a 8/10 instead of the 10/10 it might otherwise have earned.
| ||
#3
|
|||
|
![]() no bsh/trs, no contribute
please edumacate yoself bout pole etiquette. the forum's got a vast libarry of poles. u made me do this =/ edit: nice watermark | ||
#4
|
|||
|
![]() Looks like a crappy 90's website.
| ||
#5
|
|||
|
![]() amazing!!!
| ||
#6
|
|||
|
![]() It's good butt would be better without the animations.
| ||
#7
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Last (censored) edited by Mortecon; 06-02-2023 at 12:57 PM.. Reason: This person needs to (stop wrong thinking and comply) read the forum rules it seems
| |||
#8
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
best compliment [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
![]() | |||
#10
|
|||
|
![]() only decent sig ive seen recently. having a good sig is classic but nobody seems to care about that either.
10/10 ~Ekco the sig rater | ||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|