Are we allowed to like AI art?

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah this is meh because the "restored" version isn't actually restoring any genuine lost information it's just painting over the original with assumptions about what should be there.

Just wait til you figure out how your visual cortex works

[Ekco]

that's an actual use case vs just random made up videos that look like shit.

pretty sure thats existed for awhile though, same tech they use to colorized shit like WW2 in Color tv show, but its not AI doing it its some other technique

[Ekco]

ah yeah i forgot about him

[Ekco]

in theory it will get good enough at the assumptions to be indistinguishable from reality, which shouldn't even be that hard considering how shit the human eyes / brain is, your brain literally hallucinates shit all the time, and i don't mean crazy people, just every time for a split second you think you see something that isn't there

"According to neuroscientist Anil Seth, the human brain is constantly hallucinating, and what we call reality is when we agree on those hallucinations. "

[Ciderpress]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

in theory it will get good enough at the assumptions to be indistinguishable from reality, which shouldn't even be that hard considering how shit the human eyes / brain is, your brain literally hallucinates shit all the time, and i don't mean crazy people, just every time for a split second you think you see something that isn't there

"According to neuroscientist Anil Seth, the human brain is constantly hallucinating, and what we call reality is when we agree on those hallucinations. "

Oh don't get me wrong it's really cool tech and I'm glad it exists for these kind of applications, it's just misleading when they call that restoration, which is an actual thing.

Sidebar: the human eye is kinda shit at resolving even if you have perfect (human) vision. Ultra-HD-4k whatever TVs basically can't get any better than they already are, other than just getting cheaper. Increased resolution becomes arbitrary once they run up against the limitations of the human eye. I wanna be able to see what hawks see.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

in theory it will get good enough at the assumptions to be indistinguishable from reality, which shouldn't even be that hard considering how shit the human eyes / brain is, your brain literally hallucinates shit all the time, and i don't mean crazy people, just every time for a split second you think you see something that isn't there

"According to neuroscientist Anil Seth, the human brain is constantly hallucinating, and what we call reality is when we agree on those hallucinations. "

once i woke up late to take a piss and i stared at a mouse, then it transformed into a spider then it transformed into a piece of paper.

But it was how it transformed.. it was litreally how the old google AI (pre chat GPT breakthrough) ai image generation looked. My brain was just looking at a shape, and trying to turn it into a recognizable shape before my vary eyes. It was almost like watching the simulation appear before you.

But it was just my brain trying to identify out of the noise we see, what Im seeing, and it's just so insane to think about how we're basically the same thing as what we're building with computers just different components.

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

once i woke up late to take a piss and i stared at a mouse, then it transformed into a spider then it transformed into a piece of paper.

But it was how it transformed.. it was litreally how the old google AI (pre chat GPT breakthrough) ai image generation looked. My brain was just looking at a shape, and trying to turn it into a recognizable shape before my vary eyes. It was almost like watching the simulation appear before you.

But it was just my brain trying to identify out of the noise we see, what Im seeing, and it's just so insane to think about how we're basically the same thing as what we're building with computers just different components.

i have BPD / whatever and about once a decade i straight up trip balls for 24-72 hours straight and go on a adventure.

has only happened twice so far and both times were insanely fun

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh don't get me wrong it's really cool tech and I'm glad it exists for these kind of applications, it's just misleading when they call that restoration, which is an actual thing.

Sidebar: the human eye is kinda shit at resolving even if you have perfect (human) vision. Ultra-HD-4k whatever TVs basically can't get any better than they already are, other than just getting cheaper. Increased resolution becomes arbitrary once they run up against the limitations of the human eye. I wanna be able to see what hawks see.

yeah it's false advertising for sure, couple of these companies exist with the idea to rip off boomers with family photo albums and VHS tape "resto" shit.

[Ekco]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gemini finally got the new ai buzzword feature that Deepseek and Chatgpt are using

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gemini finally got the new ai buzzword feature that Deepseek and Chatgpt are using

already stopped using Gemini again, it's just so fucking bad compared to DeepSeek and ChatGPT at the moment

and then there's this
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and people are going to use Gemini because it's Google and they can (i assume) not let you use a different LLM with your Gmail and other Google services if they want to, and do what Apple did with the walled in garden approach to retaining users.