Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Chortles Snortles]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[PlsNoBan]

Not to mention unless you're pulling/killing incredibly slowly you WILL NOT be able to maintain casting bane and pox on every single mob without ever going oom. Canni and torpor are great but not THAT great. The claims you're making are asinine. They aren't sustainable and not realistic in a high dps fast pulling group. Your solo data is garbage.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

You need to answer this simple question:

If a group doesn't care about losing 30+ DPS because they don't want their Shaman root/rotting, why do they care about losing 30 DPS by picking a Shaman over Mage?

[Keebz]

Answer this question:

In what context is root rotting low 40's mobs a productive or interesting thing for 4 level 60 casters to be doing?

It's a trick question. There is not such a context.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Keebz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Answer this question:

In what context is root rotting low 40's mobs a productive or interesting thing for 4 level 60 casters to be doing?

It's a trick question. There is not such a context.

Exactly! Now you are gettng it after 100 pages lol. This entire thread people kept claiming they want a Mage because their group is chain pulling mobs they can kill in 30 seconds.

Level 60s aren't gong to be doing that, and Shaman is better at camps like Ixiblat Fer and Fungi King because 30 DPS is irrelevant. You want better safety to secure the kill so your group doesn't wipe and lose the camp.

Level 60s aren't going to be chain pulling anything unless they are just topping off XP. Then you can root/rot because the mobs are indeed basically easy level 49 mobs lol.

It only took 100 pages for you to realize the chain pulling argument was silly[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] It was the entire crux of arguing for a Mage.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

silly[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am maintaining civility in this discussion, and my position is founded on hard evidence. The only insults I throw are thrown in defense.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you have not maintained civility in this discussion.

I have maintained civility in my posts to you - in which I have ONLY stated facts and asked questions - and despite my civility you have (repeatedly) called me a troll, called me silly, accused me of doing/posting things I have not done/posted, and meanwhile have continued to ignore my simple questions and avoided responding to the many facts I've stated. I present both of our posts - from this thread and elsewhere - as evidence of my civility, and you have provided no counterevidence despite me requesting you provide it (multiple times).

Why do you opt out of partaking in a civil discussion with me, and meanwhile claim that you are maintaining civility in this discussion (yet choose to continue to call me names for [seemingly] no reason)?


Why do you feel the need to "defend yourself" from any of the facts I have stated or questions I have asked?

[Keebz]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Exactly! Now you are gettng it after 100 pages lol. This entire thread people kept claiming they want a Mage because their group is chain pulling mobs they can kill in 30 seconds.

Level 60s aren't gong to be doing that, and Shaman is better at camps like Ixiblat Fer and Fungi King because 30 DPS is irrelevant. You want better safety to secure the kill so your group doesn't wipe and lose the camp.

Nice gaslighting. You wasted 100 pages arguing nonsense about your cherry-picked logs and "math". Now if you want to talk about the original topic, you have to actually make an argument for shaman. They don't win by default. Sorry bud.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Keebz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nice gaslighting. You wasted 100 pages arguing nonsense about your cherry-picked logs and "math". Now if you want to talk about the original topic, you have to actually make an argument for shaman. They don't win by default. Sorry bud.

DSM switches arguments faster than Trump does about the Mar-a-Lago raid

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM switches arguments faster than Trump does about the Mar-a-Lago raid

Not really. I am debating like 8 people at a time. They are all wrong, and can't even individually stay on topic. They have to keep switching arguments to try and prove they are right. Post history is quite clear[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What a fucking tool …