******Official politics thread ******

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lucky charms and Jameson?

Somebody had to bring Swift in on how to utilize children.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Amen

Also, saw back pew at HEB. Bought blue testament, the IPA, and satyrs swill

Alpreciate the buys. Wbatxs on the bottom of the cans? We put quotes and memorials (RIP Angus Young as an example).

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Somebody had to bring Swift in on how to utilize children.

He "suggested" Irish catholic children as food. That's not the group I'd be taking out of circulation

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're a liberal right? You want socialized medicine. Why aren't you paying other people's medical bills already then?

Most people that willingly identify as liberal these days are big-city high income types that think racism and the environment are the two most important issues in the world. Bill Gates and Warren buffet are liberals...

Socialists are different because they say they want to help working people they actually mean it...the environment and the race stuff is the bullshit part for them (very few of them actually think about either a lot).

In many ways, Socialists and Liberals are enemies.

I think that on a macro-level socialized medicine has been proven (it's not really something you can honestly debate) to provide the same quality of healthcare for a lower overall price to the country. As Chase, Buffet, and Bezo's admit "It's a hungry tapeworm on the American Economy"

Socialized medicine is my least radical idea...But its too radical for corporate Democrats that are essentially Republicans that care about race and the environment.

I'll let you figure out why I'm not paying everyone medical bills. Seems kind of like a non-sequitur to me.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Most people that willingly identify as liberal these days are big-city high income types that think racism and the environment are the two most important issues in the world. Bill Gates and Warren buffet are liberals...

Socialist is different because they say they want to help working people they actually mean it...the environment and the race stuff is the bullshit part for them very few of them actually about.

In many ways, Socialists and Liberals are enemies.

I think that on a macro-level socialized medicine has been proven (it's not really something you can honestly debate) to provide the same quality of healthcare for a lower overall price to the country. As Chase, Buffet, and Bezo's admit "It's a hungry tapeworm on the American Economy"

Socialized medicine is my least radical idea...

I'll let you figure out why I'm not paying everyone medical bills. Seems kind of like a non-sequitur to me.

It's the same logic you are using against Locke for having slaves.

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's the same logic you are using against Locke for having slaves.

Locke argued that it was perfectly moral to have slaves because they have no rights after surrendering in battle (dubious claim that all slaves surrendered in battle right there).

What does that have to do with the argument that Socialized medicine is better for the host country than a (mostly) capitalist healthcare system?

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well as Mick points out, none of my examples work because they are Russian and Chinese savages that are genetically inferior and thus -- guns work different for them than us.

Either that or Mick full of shit and people that like guns like getting on their soap box about defending against tyrannical governments -- but really they just want to shoot the shit out of some cans and make fun of liberals.

russia and china to date have never had the armed citizenry that America has ever had

let alone has had Melania of subjugation and conformity in their culture. SO WHAT a surprise they have not had an uprising.

Seriously Russians and Chinese citizens are dehumanized broken people.

You see this is why liberals are so dumb, you look at everything paint deep.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Locke argued that it was perfectly moral to have slaves because they have no rights after surrendering in battle (dubious claim that all slaves surrendered in battle right there).

What does that have to do with the argument that Socialized medicine is better for the host country than a (mostly) capitalist healthcare system?

Because you aren't practicing what you preach either.

Also how many illegal immigrants and refugees do you have sleeping in your house/apartment?

[Patriam1066]

Russia has never had uprisings

Heard it here first folks

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're ignoring all those that came to America from England for business opportunity and religious fanaticism. Not to mention the hordes of Irish, Germans, Polish, Italians, Africans etc. ever since.

lets raid boss on em boys its planking time


hypothesis JURIS DOCTORATE "Women are involved in business opportunities in the New World in the 17th century"



hypergamy also doesn't involve traveling to a nonexistent economy


Try again