So i get banned for "boxing"

[Destan]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ahh, this feels like Toop all over again. Person breaks rules, gets caught, swears innocence to enstill doubt in population, get sympathy.

Anyways, I'll have you know that I looked into the ban on the OP's accounts, and confirmed that not only were they boxing at the time on the same pc, but in every single case of accounts logged into from their household, they were always from the same single computer.

You guys are on the right track with the DLL, but I'll say that nothing is based on the MAC Address. Nor is it processes (Our DLL does not send information to the server about other processes running on your computer unless a process interacts with the EQ Client).

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rogean wins the thread. Time to start a new one!

[SamwiseRed]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ahh, this feels like Toop all over again. Person breaks rules, gets caught, swears innocence to enstill doubt in population, get sympathy.

Anyways, I'll have you know that I looked into the ban on the OP's accounts, and confirmed that not only were they boxing at the time on the same pc, but in every single case of accounts logged into from their household, they were always from the same single computer.

You guys are on the right track with the DLL, but I'll say that nothing is based on the MAC Address. Nor is it processes (Our DLL does not send information to the server about other processes running on your computer unless a process interacts with the EQ Client).

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

can you hack my girlfriends facebook? i know that bitch is cheating. thnx

[kprobe]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ahh, this feels like Toop all over again. Person breaks rules, gets caught, swears innocence to enstill doubt in population, get sympathy.

Anyways, I'll have you know that I looked into the ban on the OP's accounts, and confirmed that not only were they boxing at the time on the same pc, but in every single case of accounts logged into from their household, they were always from the same single computer.

You guys are on the right track with the DLL, but I'll say that nothing is based on the MAC Address. Nor is it processes (Our DLL does not send information to the server about other processes running on your computer unless a process interacts with the EQ Client).

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cheers for clarification. Sounds like its a bit more solid damning evidence =)

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ahh, this feels like Toop all over again. Person breaks rules, gets caught, swears innocence to enstill doubt in population, get sympathy.

Anyways, I'll have you know that I looked into the ban on the OP's accounts, and confirmed that not only were they boxing at the time on the same pc, but in every single case of accounts logged into from their household, they were always from the same single computer.

You guys are on the right track with the DLL, but I'll say that nothing is based on the MAC Address. Nor is it processes (Our DLL does not send information to the server about other processes running on your computer unless a process interacts with the EQ Client).

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

THE EMPEROR'S JUSTICE HAS COME FOR YOU FGTS.

ALL HAIL EMPEROR ROGEAN.

YOU SHOULDA NEVER LEFT FOR STAR WARS AND YOU KNOW IT.

WB BREW.

[Bardalicious]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You guys are on the right track with the DLL, but I'll say that nothing is based on the MAC Address. Nor is it processes (Our DLL does not send information to the server about other processes running on your computer unless a process interacts with the EQ Client).

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I admit that I haven't been around much lately, but per Secrets when the .dll first came out and the sting took place, and this post by Uthgaard:

Originally Posted by Uthagain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If I'm remembering this right, webwolf was flagged because he was looking at macroquest in a web browser while logged into p99, which actually triggered the system to recognize the browser as macroquest, since it was intended to look for it no matter what it's name was, but browsers have this interesting habit of putting the page title in the application name.

Also also, why are half of the people in this thread banned?

If above post is accurate to my previous understanding of how the .dll worked, then yes, at least previously it sent back running process information (thus the browser, which wouldn't have interacted with eqgame.exe in any way, still sent a false positive back to you).

Idk, just being argumentative I suppose. It really doesn't matter to me - It was highly intuitive to have implemented a proxy dll to work around client file alterations to stop cheating and I appreciate the addition.

[Tombom]

incinerated

[Wamorn]

The dsetup.dll tracks something...my sophos is constantly popping up saying its a virus/malware. I had to set it to skip live scanning that file in order to play

[Wamorn]

The dsetup.dll tracks something...my sophos is constantly popping up saying its a virus/malware. I had to set it to skip live scanning that file in order to play

[Wamorn]

Sorry for dbl post

[mizin]

We have one gigantic computer desk with both of our computers on it. We play literally right next to eachother.