Item recharging is an exploit of game mechanics

[Tamiah2011]

get rid of all clicky items, most are just exploits and game would be fine without them, I will follow whatever guide line R99 staff decides and live with them.

[Murphy]

Originally Posted by Tamiah2011 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

get rid of all clicky items, most are just exploits and game would be fine without them, I will follow whatever guide line R99 staff decides and live with them.

I think you need to exit stage WoW.

[Pudge]

i agree with OP. this will affect pvp greatly.

while everyone WANTS to be able to recharge their items.. everyone also wants to stand on roofs of buildings all day and collect exp risk-free. these are exploits and should be removed

[Sarkhan]

Can't believe I actually read those 10 pages of mostly trolling (although i think the trolling made me keep reading, so thanks Samoht)

How about we look at item recharging a different way... They did realize it was exploitable so they did raise buyback prices but they never did put the prices to 99999 when that would have been the simplest fix. Instead they simply raised the buyback price to 10k+ (depending on the item).

With the economy of P1999 maybe they should raise the buyback prices even more (like, 50k+ depending on items). This will leave recharging still in, but far less desirable and when people are willing to drop the coin to recharge the item, it will at least be a fair amount of coin taken out of the system....

And for those who feel the need to troll and say things like "get proof, your opinion doesn't matter" I think you're missing the fact that this IS a thread in the "Server Chat" forums and it is precisely that -> Server chat, talking about the server and aspects about it... The thread is not a direct petition to the GMs (even though I know they hope the GMs read it and give it thought) so they should be able to give their opinions and thoughts on the subject.

[Nirgon]

Where's the patch notes about necro taps on raid mobs

[Lulz Sect]

since we al know about it, we shall all use it to our advantage so none of us has the upper hand on each other.

lets hold hands

[Rusl]

To build upon Yendor's point, they eventually made rangers ranged dps via AAs and autofire etc so let's implement that since it's obviously what was originally intended by verant.

[Uaellaen]

lol you guys are so cute ... most of you havent even been playing this game back in 2000 and still argue like you have been there ... BEFORE luclin was ever released i was at FT 16 (cap) on live ... and before you say its impossible, its not ... fear 2.0 alone has 2 FT1 items, robe of inspiration and cazics brain ... i know items with the same FT value didnt stack at first, but i cant remember if that was also fixed before or after luclin ...

and as for the hoop, lifetaps been unresistable here, so yeah it was never used on live like it was used here ... because it was simply not this powerful, but its fixed now and back in line ...

conclusion: item recharge is classic, project 1999 tries to be as classic as possible (limited by information from 1999 ~2001 / coding issues), everything WORKS AS INTENDED

[skorge]

Samoht = troll of the year, if the proof is on me, then why was the change made by the P99 staff in the first place...so I need proof to have them reverse a change that was non-classic? Were lifetap resists nerfed in classic?

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by skorge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if the proof is on me, then why was the change made by the P99 staff in the first place...

You've asked this several times, and it's been answered several times. You seem to have a selective reading problem.