Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:15 PM
Gwence Gwence is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 561
Default ..

You guys should boycott food irl, that'll show em!
  #82  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:16 PM
Kope Kope is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamiah2011 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
these's morons running this server
WTH? The last people you should be calling morons are the people running the server. This is just pure slander at this point Tam...
  #83  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:16 PM
Ennoia Ennoia is offline
Fire Giant

Ennoia's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You have a valid point Ennoia, and I'm not trying to argue that. I'm saying that the method which a certain group of people have decided on employing is probably doing more harm than good. What good can come of you typing "ban this or that" with every post you make? Will it bring Uthgaard back? Probably not. It's also against the rules.
With the recent re-evaluation of the severity of discipline, my suspension would be up after I was done brushing my teeth. See what I did there? THAT is why they can't be lenient, even if hundreds of accounts are involved.
__________________
[50 Magician] Ennoia (Dark Elf)
TEAM UTHGAARD
  #84  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:16 PM
Skope Skope is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: place
Posts: 767
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Arguing semantics does nothing to help the server, Skope.
it's not semantics. the rules weren't not enforced to my "liking", but weren't enforced at all. an incredibly important rule was taken back, rewritten for a special case and then presented to the community as a solution. to even assume that i'm arguing over semantics is just your Loke showing. We had a good thing going.
  #85  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:17 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You guys should boycott food irl, that'll show em!
Gwence, this isn't RnF, and I would appreciate it if you kept your posts in this thread on the topic of the group of people who are making posts which are detrimental to the health and population of the server.
  #86  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:18 PM
Demetrium Demetrium is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I never said that. In fact I have given several indications that this is precisely not how I feel. However, I have said that the rules of the forums should not be set aside simply because a group of people feel that the rules of the game haven't been enforced to their liking.
I can't possibly comprehend a scenario where this thread is anything short of a complete failure in every regard.
  #87  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:19 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ennoia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the recent re-evaluation of the severity of discipline, my suspension would be up after I was done brushing my teeth. See what I did there? THAT is why they can't be lenient, even if hundreds of accounts are involved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
it's not semantics. the rules weren't not enforced to my "liking", but weren't enforced at all. an incredibly important rule was taken back, rewritten for a special case and then presented to the community as a solution. to even assume that i'm arguing over semantics is just your Loke showing. We had a good thing going.
You guys are arguing the same point: that the rules were not enforced to your liking. They were enforced, punishments were handed down. You didn't like them. The proper format for voicing your grievances with GM Decisions has been outlined for you. Repetition of negative references in forums is not the proper method.
  #88  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:23 PM
Ennoia Ennoia is offline
Fire Giant

Ennoia's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You guys are arguing the same point: that the rules were not enforced to your liking. They were enforced, punishments were handed down. You didn't like them. The proper format for voicing your grievances with GM Decisions has been outlined for you. Repetition of negative references in forums is not the proper method.
No, the rules were no enforced, period. There has been a long standing position on what happens with MQ2 use on P99, and it wasn't enforced. NO LENIENCE means NO LENIENCE.
__________________
[50 Magician] Ennoia (Dark Elf)
TEAM UTHGAARD
  #89  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:27 PM
citizen1080 citizen1080 is offline
Planar Protector

citizen1080's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Your Wallet
Posts: 2,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bob, I rest my case with you.
Just because two well known trolls very obviously took one part of my discussion and turned it around backwards does nothing to help your case. =)

As for me being silly in my reference I will just say it is a slippery slope.
__________________
Bob the Broker
  #90  
Old 09-06-2011, 07:27 PM
Tamiah2011 Tamiah2011 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
WTH? The last people you should be calling morons are the people running the server. This is just pure slander at this point Tam...
hmmmmm? who else should be blamed for this mess? While Uthgaard was running around perma banning players for stupid stuff like 2 boxing and training they had people exploiting and hacking the server.The players with the minor offenses are still perma banned and the one hacking are returning to game, so who should be blamed ? Let me guess me for speaking up not the one running the server.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.