Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Should the P1999 Management have been harsher with the 365 cheaters
Yes 0 0%
No 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:05 PM
visage visage is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
there's a couple guides and probably a couple old GMs that would disagree with you
Guides , old gm's? Names? Are their opinions worth anything to the matter at hand. If by in point the mafia aka the P99 staff is all crooked. The majority of the players on the server would agree these folks need a ban. We all know this. It's out of our hands. Whether Rogean or Nilborg or anyone for that matter can be persuaded to change the actions. Well my friend thats another story. Surely pointing the finger at Uthgaard won't get anything resolved. I feel your efforts are futile and should be used for more constructive things that might make a difference in the servers life.
  #82  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:07 PM
visage visage is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 846
Default

P99 isn't a democracy. Therefore we don't ever get the right to say shit about the direction of the rules or staff. Like in RL , VIA LA REVOLUTION , maybe you can convince Rogean to be impeached if you hate it. Tho biting the hand that feeds you obviously isn't a wise choice...
  #83  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:08 PM
Seaweedpimp Seaweedpimp is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,640
Default

I wish i could of used third party programs and phat box leveling for years and get a 2 week slackban and my money gone.

Pretty terrible. Wipe the shit off p99 ass pls?
  #84  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:10 PM
Skope Skope is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: place
Posts: 767
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by visage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Guides , old gm's? Names? Are their opinions worth anything to the matter at hand. If by in point the mafia aka the P99 staff is all crooked. The majority of the players on the server would agree these folks need a ban. We all know this. It's out of our hands. Whether Rogean or Nilborg or anyone for that matter can be persuaded to change the actions. Well my friend thats another story. Surely pointing the finger at Uthgaard won't get anything resolved. I feel your efforts are futile and should be used for more constructive things that might make a difference in the servers life.
reading comprehension... that's not why i'm pointing the finger at uthgaard. 2 entirely separate situations that we're discussing. i'm talking about how uthgaard handles petitions and namely raid-involved petitions whereas you're discussing the action, or rather inaction towards cheaters. think by now it's obvious that the majority of the playerbase would rather have them banned outright, but as i said that has little to do with uthgaard. the other issue, though, is as far as i've heard and gathered, entirely up to him and he doesn't man up.
  #85  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:10 PM
visage visage is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaweedpimp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I wish i could of used third party programs and phat box leveling for years and get a 2 week slackban and my money gone.

Pretty terrible. Wipe the shit off p99 ass pls?
Serius if using MQ was a 2 week ban I think the majority of the server should be aloud to use it than we can all take a 2 week vacation and laugh. Though who knows how long MQ was being used. So for the life of the server we should be able to use it. Than get a 2 week vacation. Course than we would have to make a seperate forum. To many stupid people using it. Than TR and TMO would use a modified MQ and people would claim that is like mETA cheating oh the anarchy it would unleash.
  #86  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:28 PM
KB_Trader KB_Trader is offline
Sarnak

KB_Trader's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 267
Default

Think a lot of you are drastically underestimating this whole xp loss thing. Going from 60 to a bit into 54 isn't a slap on the wrist - that's ATLEAST a good 60 hours of grinding if not more. That is also only the time spent actually xping, and if you're like me where atleast half of your play time is spent sitting LFG at the entrance to a zone, it's going to take a LOT longer. Now, for someone who plays like 10 hours a day, sure it's not a big deal, but for someone who played a few hours after work this is absolutely painful.

Also, lol at people saying things like "DELETE ALL DER SHOW EQ'D ITEMS." I can think of a handful of items that would be considered an easier camp with show eq and most of them are no drop. Anything besides those items is not any harder or easier with show eq.

That being said, sounds like some of you guys needed the ban more than I did. It's a fucking video game, guys. Jesus christ, some of you guys argue this shit like your life fucking depends on it. Go outside and touch a tit or something.
  #87  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:35 PM
Kope Kope is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KB_Trader [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also, lol at people saying things like "DELETE ALL DER SHOW EQ'D ITEMS." I can think of a handful of items that would be considered an easier camp with show eq and most of them are no drop. Anything besides those items is not any harder or easier with show eq.
While I do partially agree people are going insane over this (calm down guys its ok, life will go on) this paragraph isn't thinking seriously KB.

Trackbots have been used for high level raid mobs for batphones for a long long time. I believe this is the thing they're talking about, and it does have some merit.
  #88  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:35 PM
inyane inyane is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 202
Default

right, its huge xp loss. I mean, it took some of these people at least a whole week to go from 50-60.

and i'm sure their guildies are just waiting to go aoe pl them in skyfire when they get back anyway, so....
  #89  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:36 PM
Seaweedpimp Seaweedpimp is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,640
Default

Nah, I played by the rules long enough.

Exile the cheatars!
  #90  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:54 PM
Uthgaard Uthgaard is offline
VIP / Contributor

Uthgaard's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by visage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Exactly. If your angry about the situation at hand and thing it's unjust. Rather than call out the middle man. Please take it to the Big wigs AKA Nilborg and Rogean. These are the people that are in charge. Therefore rather than take such statements out on Uthgaard a lower end person. Take it to the for front and be smart about it. If your supervisor won't enforce a issue at your work... Do you keep blaming him , or do you stand up on your own two feet and go to the next chain of command? Stop blaming Uthgaard. It does what it's told... Much like it puts the lotion on the skin... Or get's the hose again....
This pretty much sums it up. If I punish the wrong person, it will just get overturned and possibly turned back around on me. If I hand over the information on the wrong person, no matter how solid it is, it will be insufficient to take action. I learned that with zianlo almost a year ago, and am constantly being reminded of it. I'm just a peon here. Don't call me the pussy, it's not like I'm not trying.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.