Somebody with wiki permissions...

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There is no reason to force a new page and leave an old page that is less accurate. Why do you want to give people bad info?

What info on this version of the page is inaccurate?

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...gh_estimate.29

If something on that version is inaccurate we can remove it.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Madeup stuff like Wrath should go on a subpage.

Lying is irrelevant. I can show you all the calculations in the code, and back it up with data. You can't.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

See? Clear trolling with no logic as to why any of my changes are bad. Please stop ruining the wiki for everybody. Why are you so destructive?

Please note that all contributions to Project 1999 Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.


This is a direct quote from the wiki. I'm sorry that reads like trolling to you. Which part of the uncomfortable reality of this actually occurring are you having problems accepting. Maybe I can help.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What info on this version of the page is inaccurate?

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...gh_estimate.29

If something on that version is inaccurate we can remove it.

That version of the page removes the combat formulas, in the combat formula section, of a wiki page that states:

This page is intended for a more technical discussion of the game mechanics. For instance, equations governing combat, how STA translates into HP, how the con color system scales with level.

What is inaccurate on this version of the page?

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...s&oldid=474650

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What info on this version of the page is inaccurate?

With regards to Cecily, he is reverting the page completely. The comabt formula there is:

[Mod] = (200 + 250) / 100 = 4.5
[Main Hand Bonus] = (50 - 25) / 3 = 8
[Max Damage] = (4.5 x 10) + 8 = 53

This is wrong. My level 60 Shaman hits for a max of 84 damage with Spear of Fate. According to this formula:

[Mod] = (200 skill+ 255 STR) / 100 = 455
[Main Hand Bonus] = 0
[Max Damage] = (4.55 x 20) = 91.

This is off by 7, and clearlt wrong.

[Cecily]

If you notice any inaccuracies feel free to edit.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you notice any inaccuracies feel free to edit.

Gladly. The old page you are reverting to has factually inaccurate formulas. You are just digging a hole for yourself, as I can easily prove your reversion is wrong. According to Cecily's edits, the damage formula is:

Mod] = (200 + 250) / 100 = 4.5
[Main Hand Bonus] = (50 - 25) / 3 = 8
[Max Damage] = (4.5 x 10) + 8 = 53

This is wrong. My level 60 Shaman hits for a max of 84 damage with Spear of Fate. According to this formula:

[Mod] = (200 skill+ 255 STR) / 100 = 455
[Main Hand Bonus] = 0
[Max Damage] = (4.55 x 20) = 91

Cecily's formula is off by 7. My formula is off by 0.

My level 60 Shadowknight hits for a max of 258 with Ancient Fire Etched Flamberge:

[Mod] = (225 skill+ 231 STR) / 100 = 4.56
[Main Hand Bonus] = 37
[Max Damage] = (4.55 x 46 + 37) = 246

Cecily's formula is off by 12. My formula is off by 1.

You are just proving you are a troll.

[Cecily]

Hmm that's a good point. Why don't you make a post about it and see if other people concur with your observations?


"There should be consensus that the information is valid for p1999 before it is copied into this page"


Best.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hmm that's a good point. Why don't you make a post about it and see if other people concur with your observations?


"There should be consensus that the information is valid for p1999 before it is copied into this page"


Best.

See? He cannot back up any claim with facts or data. This is just going to be used as evidence of you trolling the wiki with incorrect information.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

See? He cannot back up any claim with facts or data. This is just going to be used as evidence of you trolling the wiki with incorrect information.

Are you going to call the wiki law police?