![]() |
|
#81
|
|||
|
None of my parses were using disciplines. As for weapons, I use Crystalline Spear for backstab, although I have a SCD for regular melee attack. My parses are with spear. Also I have 255 strength, without wolf form my attack is about 1162 (not exact because not in game atm, but its just over 1200 with shared wolf form)
And yes, the problem is only with backstab. It was broken at the same exact time that the pet minimum damage bug occurred, and was supposed to be fixed in the same patch (rogean broadcasted that both bugs were fixed pending update in game) but the backstab fix never occurred. The ONLY thing broken with backstab is the fact that it hits for minimum damage MUCH too often. The max and min damage is fine, the magic number for damage is fine. Its just getting minimum damage backstabs as often as the parses show is very wrong. We've provided plenty of evidence that minimum backstabs occur way too often. Hell, just scroll back a few pages and look at the parses. Anybody who plays a rogue right now knows backstab is messed up. There has been plenty of pages in this thread related to the actual discussion of this bug (granted some was off topic, most isn't). | ||
|
Last edited by Arkyani; 07-18-2011 at 11:18 AM..
| |||
|
#82
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#83
|
|||
|
I've just been trying to point out that while you guys are duplicating it on P99, Kanras still isn't seeing what you're seeing. There is a lack of control in the testing somewhere, so before you even go working on code you have to see what's wrong with the test. In this instance a +40 ATK weapon at level 60 is a pretty nice boost that no one here has access to. Fixing that problem first allows Kanras to do testing and fine tune his results to what should be expected for THIS timeline, not a late-Kunark weapon and a Velious or later trash-raid mob. What's weird is that he got results on a super high AC mob that are to be expected but our lower AC mobs here with lesser weapons are giving worse results. If anything backstab should've been too good, but it isn't. I'd consider that a pretty big problem that may lean away from a simple tweak, hence the need to fix the test before looking at the problem.
| ||
|
#84
|
|||
|
Its pretty clear to me that kanras is using EPIC weapon and testing it on mobs we dont even have ingame atm and then saying its fine its all fine when we all using a different weapon and mobs to test.
So i come too a conclusion that hes not gonna fix this problem and its gonna sit this way till they get around to releasing the rest of the expantition and epics WAKE UP people you cant see this? | ||
|
#85
|
|||
|
I think it's worth noting that something unknown is driving attack as well. With the exact same buffs, str and weapons i don't necessarily have the same ATK as another rogue. Recently in a rogue group at a raid, we did an ATK check and all 5 of us had different ATK values, despite all having maxed skills, 255 str and the same wolf form/haste. I can't imagine how that's possible, but there is some back end shenanigans going on with ATK for sure.
Also, even with VOG and share wolf form (20 and 30 stacking attack respectively) the problem persists. So the 40 attack added by ragebringer is not accounting for these differences unless item pure +ATK is added differently than spell +ATK. | ||
|
#86
|
|||
|
Now THAT is an interesting development. I usually end up with 1141 to 1200 ATK on my Ranger and I still hit for beans on Sky mobs (granted, this is expected, and I still pull decent DPS but it never gets close to a raid buffed monk or rogue when they aren't using a disc), but can actually kill a mob in KC without missing once at level 57. ATK may not be the key problem, but that's why that information is important. How much are the ATK values off by? Are they off in multiples/increments? Could unlisted STR above 255 account for these differences?
| ||
|
#87
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, Wiz, quit being a jerk. Their test server is/was moving locations.
__________________
Shiftin Anout
Formerly of Tunare | |||
|
#88
|
|||
|
I have *close* to max STR so I still get indrect +ATK bonuses from bard songs from +STR, but are there any songs that offer any direct +ATK bonuses? I would hope it's a matter of an unchecked buff or something simple because that's a fairly large spread over something that should be impossible at this point in the game.
| ||
|
#89
|
|||
|
As for different attack values, some people may have been using shrunken goblin skull earring to buff their attack as well.
Just by looking at the amount of views on this thread compared with the other Bugs, its quite obvious a LOT of people are affected by it. | ||
|
#90
|
|||
|
It was 5 rogues + a druid (for wolf form/spot heals). We should have been affected by bard songs. Again i'm going off memory and will get better values tonight or next time something pops and i can get a few folks on.
| ||
![]() |
|
|