Court blocks equality law.

[Gravydoo II]

Not according to your own doctrine. I thought you were being "wiped out" and "Replaced" lololol now you'll inherit the earth hahahahahahahahaha

[bubur]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not according to your own doctrine. I thought you were being "wiped out" and "Replaced" lololol now you'll inherit the earth hahahahahahahahaha

this was always the thing that confused me tbh

like if the vaccine kills everyone that takes it, then why would they give it to the ppl that are the most easily influenced by appeals to authority to take it

counterpoint being the people that take it and a healthy amount of boosters will no longer be able to have children, that's possible. and maybe they don't care who we are or what we believe in; they just want to slow down the population growth

possible anyway.

t.
i got the double jab, probably wont get a booster until they force me too because i am not afraid of coofing, or killing your grandma

[Gustoo]

Originally Posted by bubur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this was always the thing that confused me tbh

like if the vaccine kills everyone that takes it, then why would they give it to the ppl that are the most easily influenced by appeals to authority to take it

I don’t believe this but maybe it’s a heroic act to find everyone who does what they’re told (like nazis did throwing Jews in ovens) and killing them.

I think a more common conspiracy would be some kinda mind control but if you gotta re up your mind control every 5 months it’s not that good.

I think the more likely reality is it’s a money grab by pharma and their friends. I think they made like a trillion zillion dollars profit?

Or wow it’s a heroic effort to save the world from one of the least deadly viruses we’ve ever encountered?

It’s a good opportunity to test latest biotech on humans en masse with a government written promise not to hold them accountable for whatever the hell happens. That’s why USA is all about pfiesser and the other one because they’re next gen tools that need testing.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not according to your own doctrine. I thought you were being "wiped out" and "Replaced" lololol now you'll inherit the earth hahahahahahahahaha

When the tainted dna collapses, Purebloods will reign supreme for sure

[Jibartik]

The vax is going to be ok to take and based on actual medical science. For as long as it takes for the antichrist to rise to power.

Then he will use a vax (that everyone is conditioned to saying yes to because of the real vaccines) to make them bleed their allegiance to him casting their soul into dust.

One way to know that vax wont be real is because you wont have to wear masks when we're told we have to take it.

If this vax was anything more than a vax, then revelations would say, "only those that had the mark on their foreheads, right arm or hid their shame were allowed to buy or sell"

So I think it's safe to get the jab until it's a bit more obvious.

What we should be concerned about is the first horse of revelations is a white one and its name is pestilence.

[Homesteaded]

Hey dipshit,

It doesn't matter what issue is being addressed with the medicine to set it's safety rating. The safety rating is independent of the issue. More morons.

[Castle2.0]

why then do we need to have the FTC investigate them for censoring conservatives if it's a junk space that doesn't represent the US?

where in your oh so important mind is the line drawn between public space and p99 forum or my sms messages?

Companies have the freedom to decide for themselves.

They can be an open platform or they can be a publisher.

Simple.

[Jibartik]

what makes you an open platform vs publisher?

[Castle2.0]

I think a platform would need to fit a few criteria:

• Open to the general public and 'free of charge' (no subscription, fees, or paywall)
• Driven by user content
• Any content moderation is not done centrally by the company (i.e. Reddit allows anyone to run their own 'reddit' and those 'reddit' mods can moderate as they please, but Reddit itself is not moderating content beyond what is legally required.
• Size. As soon as you're big enough to be a 'public square' and enjoy a natural monopoly.

If you fit all of the above criteria, you are defacto a platform.

Smaller companies that want 230 Section protection should be allowed to self-declare as a platform if they meet all the criteria except size.

The legislators can figure out the rest of the details.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think a platform would need to fit a few criteria:

• Open to the general public and 'free of charge' (no subscription, fees, or paywall)
• Driven by user content
• Any content moderation is not done centrally by the company (i.e. Reddit allows anyone to run their own 'reddit' and those 'reddit' mods can moderate as they please, but Reddit itself is not moderating content beyond what is legally required.
• Size. As soon as you're big enough to be a 'public square' and enjoy a natural monopoly.

If you fit all of the above criteria, you are defacto a platform.

Smaller companies that want 230 Section protection should be allowed to self-declare as a platform if they meet all the criteria except size.

The legislators can figure out the rest of the details.

So we should be able to report p99 to the feds to have them review every post and then jail Rogan and nilbog for the things we said?

Or should our internet identity link to our real life and then we are liable?

Or should they shut the website down?

There is a smoking gun on nearly every post on this forum that would hold up in court for half the acts of terror that happened in the last 9 months. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]