America Vs China

[moleman124]

Initially America would have decent micro to keep China at bay , but china would simply end up out macro'ing America

[naez]

More like tl;dr. Nuclear war-- never will happen. Would have already. I have other more important conspiracy trivia to catch up with.

[Envious]

China would never get here, then they would starve.

[naez]

that would make him the antichrist

[mimixownzall]

With a far superior navy/air force, China would have a hell of a time getting here.

That is a long distance to cover trying to get millions of personell to america.

Let's say they do manage to get to America. Now they face the most heavily armed civilian population on the planet.

[Beastro]

Originally Posted by mimixownzall [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With a far superior navy/air force, China would have a hell of a time getting here.

That is a long distance to cover trying to get millions of personell to america.

Let's say they do manage to get to America. Now they face the most heavily armed civilian population on the planet.

No damn way China could fight to the US, a logistical impossibility.

The only scenario would be a war with Korea as the battlefield. Beyond that it's just the USAF and USN against the PLAN and PLAAF on China's doorstep.

The US would economically choke China to death before they too would succumb to the economic dark age plaguing the whole world the war would cause.

[naez]

US cannot economically "choke" China. The US economy depends on Asian credit just to keep going, whereas China can sustain itself.

Also the Chinese navy would defeat the United States' with ease, especially with a home-court advantage. One submarine can sink an entire fleet of ships before backup subs arrive. However the United States has flying saucers that go underwater, but I'm not sure if they are equipped with any sophisticated weaponry (but I would assume so).

[Beastro]

US cannot economically "choke" China. The US economy depends on Asian credit just to keep going, whereas China can sustain itself.

The US has the military to blockade China long enough to drag them down along with.

In the end this thread is just silly because it all comes back to the enormous economic damage that would result from such a war.

Also the Chinese navy would defeat the United States' with ease, especially with a home-court advantage. troll troll troll troll troll

Could have gotten a bite had to you not added in the flying saucer bit there man.

[naez]

Yea I thought I might have trolled a bit too far

[Ronas]

Was just thinking back to Iraq wars, the first time around with Kuwait America/UN stuck a sanction on fresh water/food and disarmant of any missle/biological weaponry to Iraq. The second time around the justification of invasion was for non-existant WMD.

Basically invaded a country with no defense system, demoralized/rotting population, no offensive capabilities. I guess that poor country was a dumping ground for the US to send all there expired weaponry on to make new and improved ones.

The strategies used was to go all out with no form of retaliation, China on the other hand is a whole new playground, the chings actually think. That's the major turning point in war games, its not who has the better weopon but who has the better plan as history has shown us time and time again.