![]() |
|
#81
|
|||
|
I am just wondering what the concern is. I understand it is possible to intentionally alter one's preferences, but outside nymphomania I can't see why someone would purposely seek to alter their sexual tastes on that level. Seems like a stretch to suggest as ATG has that someone is going to decide that because they have failed finding a partner in 50% or the population, they ought to redirect their search to an alternative 2%.
I know exposure can alter preference too, but I don't see why that is a concern either tbh. I mean, what straight person is going to decide to immers themselves in gay culture and activity until they develop an affinity for it? That's irrational. What is the concern Fash? I understand the behavior is morally repugnant to you, but what are you worried will happen? Everyone will become gay? Honestly want to understand the concern.
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#82
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#83
|
||||
|
Quote:
Similar politics with addiction "its a disease, its genetic". Same agenda politics as the gay lobby, many parallels in the playbook.
__________________
Kirban Manaburn / Speedd Haxx
PKer & Master Trainer and Terrorist of Sullon Zek Kills: 1278, Deaths: 76, Killratio: 16.82 | |||
|
|
||||
|
#84
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, sexual orientation and transgenderism are rather different things. Transgenderism is a reality-detached mental illness. I expect you're insulting many homos drawing those parallels. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#85
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#86
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#87
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#88
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is a major focus of study for even doctoral candidates who study and examine the Roman Empire. The political questions of our time were the same exact questions of their time, in regards to social welfare and homosexuality. Nero for example was the first one to coin the idea of Foodstamps by using tattoos and Roman citizen identification marks (mark of the beast). That's a tangent. But homosexuality was one of the issues that the Roman Empire decided to try to tackle, because it had been legal for so long. The question is why did they determine that homosexuality was bad? That's where I'd be looking. I doubt you will find anyone here equipped enough to field your question from a historical standpoint. The history of other advanced civilizations and homosexuality is probably the best starting point to begin to answer the questions you asked. Rome has a lot to teach. Homosexuality started out as legal, and was widely accepted among politicians and elites until the final years of the Empire. In the final years, it was outlawed. Why?
__________________
Kirban Manaburn / Speedd Haxx
PKer & Master Trainer and Terrorist of Sullon Zek Kills: 1278, Deaths: 76, Killratio: 16.82 | |||
|
Last edited by AzzarTheGod; 07-22-2016 at 07:03 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#89
|
|||
|
From what I understand the residents of Sparta also practiced pederasty but it was later outlawed or forbidden. This was before the Romans and not subject to Christian influence.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#90
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'll respond to your triple questions in a sec. Maybe that will answer your questions. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|