Nice France terrorist attack

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok got it.

Who did they mean by THE PEOPLE? It wasnt just warm body status.

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who did they mean by THE PEOPLE? It wasnt just warm body status.

well enlighten me, dear defender of the constitution

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Destroying the culture happens when you ship in unassimilated third worlders who dont respect our laws. You have to defend the culture and its laws or they wont remain in place. This "we have to include everyone" idea is garbage and is shown to be incorrect thinking that has misrepresented the founders intent. I dont remember them extending rights to the natives? to the slaves? Mexicans? Chinese? All that has happened is we have been diluted through legalisms to include people that were not even intended to be covered by our laws. Its like proximity is the only thing that gives you "rights" give me a break.

Unassimilated is the key adjective in your post, and, yes, I agree that assimilation is necessary with any form of immigration. What you're proposing is based on a guess of founder's intent which cannot be rationally guessed, so we have to use the words given to us that make up the laws of the land and uphold them including those amendments that have been added to the constitution. Slave were 3/5 of a person initially then the 13th and 14th amendments went through, and it wasn't until the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts that those amendment's threads came into fruition.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

well enlighten me, dear defender of the constitution

If you didnt look like these guys you werent included.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The rest of you were shoehorned in through leftist subversion from the 60s onward.

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you didnt look like these guys you werent included.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The rest of you were shoehorned in through leftist subversion from the 60s onward.

why didn't they say so in the constitution ? they were pretty smart, and they didn't think of that ..? that's kinda weird, don't you think ? why not say "we, the white people.." ?

Of course you can also denie the influence of Les Lumières on the american constitution that pretty much consecrated the unalienable rights that every human are born with.

In 20 minutes, you're gonna say that the bill of rights is a jewish plot to bring down the white man.. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why didn't they say so in the constitution ? they were pretty smart, and they didn't think of that ..? that's kinda weird, don't you think ? why not say "we, the white people.." ?

Of course you can also denie the influence of Les Lumières on the american constitution that pretty much consecrated the unalienable rights that every human are born with.

In 20 minutes, you're gonna say that the bill of rights is a jewish plot to bring down the white man.. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The world was real fucking big then. They didnt even envision Arabs or Mexicans flooding in. At the time freeing slaves was laughable . They also had faith in the fact that their people would want to remain cuck free. Nothing is perfect.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why didn't they say so in the constitution ? they were pretty smart, and they didn't think of that ..? that's kinda weird, don't you think ? why not say "we, the white people.." ?

Of course you can also denie the influence of Les Lumières on the american constitution that pretty much consecrated the unalienable rights that every human are born with.

In 20 minutes, you're gonna say that the bill of rights is a jewish plot to bring down the white man.. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not Jewish but its nothing new. Ive mentioned it here several times but even in Platos time they new that a democracy leads to a tyranny. The founders did the best they could to check mate mob rule but like I said the world was pretty homogenous in each region and they didnt envision (((globalism))).

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The world was real fucking big then. They didnt even envision Arabs or Mexicans flooding in. At the time freeing slaves was laughable . They also had faith in the fact that their people would want to remain cuck free. Nothing is perfect.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

It's really a shame that i know the founding pillars of your country better than yourself.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's really a shame that i know the founding pillars of your country better than yourself.

But uh it says men does that mean women shouldn't get rights? Just goes to show how silly it all is. Blood and soil. Countries and governments rise and fall the people remain.

ETA: With specific wording of "men" how did we get to womens rights? Its all shifting sand. Good intentions from an enlightened and homogenous people that has been twisted to force cultural dilution.

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But uh it says men does that mean women shouldn't get rights? Just goes to show how silly it all is. Blood and soil. Countries and governments rise and fall the people remain.

..which is why there was an amendment to the constitution to deny the prohibition of the vote to women.