Most Dominant Guild Ever? VOTE

[Baler]

TMO for rmt.
Rampage for killing blue.
BDA for secretly hoarding loot on blue jacking up the price of items in the process. Which I suspect may have some rmt relations which caused them to move to that other live progression server.

The top 3 forum quest guilds is another topic.

None of the guilds on blue were/are dominant to be honest. They all had their place but none of them ran the entire server.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bored and trying to kill time at work before the long weekend, but its nice to see some old faces shit posting on rnf again. Also you're wrong, but thats to be expected from TMO spin masters. Now we just need Tiggles and Eccezan to show up.

Please point out where I'm wrong.. if you can? Like i did. Also, hide behind assumed "spin".

[Detoxx]

TMO taking a commanding lead. I'm honored though, I'm the only one who was the guild leader of 2 guilds on that list.

Also, dannyl must hate forsaken. Only ones out of alphabetical order

[Eponymous Anonymous]

That's because Forsaken is utterly forgettable.

[Loke]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please point out where I'm wrong.. if you can? Like i did. Also, hide behind assumed "spin".

Well, first you show your bias by claiming IB dominated stale classic content, when in fact they dominated all classic content, even when it was fresh. Note, I was in DA at this point, so I have no reason to defend IB since they were dominating my guild (we were competitive, but IB was clear #1).

But mostly we just disagree on what constitutes dominance. I think the fact that IB and their offshoots dominated the vast majority of content (even if I concede VP) shows dominance more than being able to hold out until the number #1 group leaves and you assume the top spot. Literally the only period TMO won was late kunark (and I suppose arguably VP), where as IB had classic, sky (minus EoV), early Kunark, and Velious considering rampage was literally rebranded IB with Hoku at the helm. Seems pretty clear to me.

[getsome]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's not forget why IB RMTed off the server in the first place =)

Hi Malcolm, I hope you are well.

I am back in the US. Let me know if you need proof again.

[Detoxx]

Originally Posted by Eponymous Anonymous [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's because Forsaken is utterly forgettable.

Did you enjoy riding our coattails? 2 of you're best members left taken to join forsaken.

[getsome]

Originally Posted by Signal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know. I just used stock images when I made that video. Getsome had been gone awhile.

Why did you libel me?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, first you show your bias by claiming IB dominated stale classic content, when in fact they dominated all classic content, even when it was fresh. Note, I was in DA at this point, so I have no reason to defend IB since they were dominating my guild (we were competitive, but IB was clear #1).

But mostly we just disagree on what constitutes dominance. I think the fact that IB and their offshoots dominated the vast majority of content (even if I concede VP) shows dominance more than being able to hold out until the number #1 group leaves and you assume the top spot. Literally the only period TMO won was late kunark (and I suppose arguably VP), where as IB had classic, sky (minus EoV), early Kunark, and Velious considering rampage was literally rebranded IB with Hoku at the helm. Seems pretty clear to me.

... No. I said it was stale classic content...to illustrate a point when you took the bait. Classic was no more stale than Early Kunark. IB/Tr fled the server shortly after VP was released. Epics weren't even out that long yet. IB had what a handful of PD robes? If that.


I think what shows dominance is being able to dominant content without your GM interference. TMO won Mid Kunark too. The only part IB was winning was Kunark up to maybe a month or two before VP. It's cute to see you claiming SKy has some kind of domination to pad your states. FE did that too. Loser mentality.


Kunark was out for how many years? Yet you claim IB dominated most of it? Dumb

Whatever you need to tell yourself at night so you sleep well I guess. Not even posting VP stats here because that's even more skewed to TMO.



Trakanon
Wins: 200 Losses: 54

Cazic Thule
Wins: 105 Losses: 13

Dracoliche
Wins: 210 Losses: 52

Lady Vox
Wins: 84 Losses: 13

Gorenaire
Wins: 84 Losses: 15

Talendor
Wins: 83 Losses: 19

Lord Nagafen
Wins: 76 Losses: 15

Innoruuk
Wins: 79 Losses: 17

Severilous
Wins: 72 Losses: 24

Faydedar
Wins: 62 Losses: 23

Venril Sathir
Wins: 82 Losses: 36

[Fountree]

TMO obvs