comcast

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would prefer to revel in the glory that is a (wo)man posting on an Internet board with the first two words of their post name calling the individual who posted above them; then this individual, with the remainder of that sentence, goes on to say those who cannot refute another's facts/argument resort to name calling.

Pot, may I introduce you to Kettle?

Non-confrontational Daldaen is non-confrontational.

Rather than just spitting out what he's trying to say, he treats you to a full paragraph of something cryptic.

Do you have a Livejournal or Blogger page where you secretly vent?

[Barrier]

This is just like my old server and their arguments!!! Classic indeed!!!

But I have comcast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by captnamazing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pretty obvious the fault is ours. our educations are 56 times more valuable but we can't figure out how to make more than 6 times the average median of our parents? pathetic

lol

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by ronasch [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Typical liberal, when they're unable to disprove fact they resort to name calling. You make me happy to be ~~~~~> RIGHT

This is the problem with rigid adherence to any ideology. It neuters the mind. You've shackled your intellectual sovereignty to the simple posits of other men and with your eyes wide shut strain to discern the subtle complexities of contemporary issues through the clouded lens of their dead eyes.

[Llodd]

Originally Posted by captnamazing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pretty obvious the fault is ours. our educations are 56 times more valuable but we can't figure out how to make more than 6 times the average median of our parents? pathetic

Once upon a time teachers were respected.

Now they're just paid 0.00000001% the wages of people who can kick/throw/hit a ball REALLY REALLY well.

[ronasch]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is the problem with rigid adherence to any ideology. It neuters the mind. You've shackled your intellectual sovereignty to the simple posits of other men and with your eyes wide shut strain to discern the subtle complexities of contemporary issues through the clouded lens of their dead eyes.

I love pseudo-intellectualism it's so grandiose. I can play your game too

[Charlievox]

Originally Posted by ronasch [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok so because some U.S. Tax dollars went to some research that resulted in what we call the Internet, it should be handed out like candy to the masses? What about those who pay no tax, should we give them Internet for free and make u pay a higher tax to offset the extra construction/maintenance required to give these non tax payers Internet. Yes I know it's already happening. Who decides what speed is standard? Can I pay extra tax for a higher speed? Do I need a license to surf the web? Net Neutrality FTL

The basic fear of all conservatives is that somewhere, somehow, someone is getting a dollar that they are morally undeserving of.

[ronasch]

Originally Posted by Charlievox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The basic fear of all conservatives is that somewhere, somehow, someone is getting a dollar that they are morally undeserving of.

Fear is a Plane just off Feerrot.

Handing out money to those who refuse to EARN it has nothing to do with morality.

You wanna hand out money that has not been earned then the money that is earned loses value, basic economic principles.

Just because u "feel" good about it doesn't mean it won't have drastic repercussions.

Give your own money, but forcing others to is akin to slavery

[drktmplr12]

Originally Posted by ronasch [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Median income 1968 $7500

Today $49000

Median income grew alittle over 6x's in that same period college tuition grew at 56x's

Yeah for government loans for eduMacation!

not disputing your point about education costs growing faster than wages.. but $1.00 in 1968 is $6.92 in 2015. which makes $7500 1968-dollars equivalent to $51950 2015-dollars. that means median incomes grew 6%.

its basic economics, which you appear to be an expert in.

[drktmplr12]

Originally Posted by ronasch [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I love pseudo-intellectualism it's so grandiose. I can play your game too

judging from the arguments..maybe you are the pseudo-intellectual. the untrained mind might believe what you are saying as fact. you really should be careful leading your friends and family astray.

I wouldn't say the same about maskedmelon. his arguments make sense and don't appeal to things like fear and hyperbole.