Terror attack in Charleston

[Itap]

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

come on dude, stop spreading disinfo

buprenorphine isn't "more addicting than opiates", it is an opiate used for replacement of street opiates. Rage episodes are a major side effect of all opiates.

You obviously have no clue what you are talking about, good job

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by Itap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You obviously have no clue what you are talking about, good job

step up and contradict me on a factual basis genius

[Madbad]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[MrSparkle001]

I'm not sure how people don't see him as a terrorist. Yeah he's not on the level of Al Qaeda or ISIS but this was definitely an act of domestic terror.

We'll see if the prosecution wants to pursue terrorism charges, if they haven't already decided.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by MrSparkle001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not sure how people don't see him as a terrorist. Yeah he's not on the level of Al Qaeda or ISIS but this was definitely an act of domestic terror.

We'll see if the prosecution wants to pursue terrorism charges, if they haven't already decided.

Yeah. I'd have to agree. He picked the oldest black church in the south, a bastion of the civil rights movement, to incite unrest/fear. Pretty cut and dry terrorism, IMO. The kid was a sociopath.

[Tradesonred]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Tradesonred [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

oh the attempted parallels, i lol'd

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by MrSparkle001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not sure how people don't see him as a terrorist.

The pre Sandy hook definition of terrorist requires the perpetrator to reside somewhere outside of the nation in which they have committed the act of terror in question.

Yes, you can commit an act of terror without being a terrorist by definition. By any actual definition he's a "freedom fighter", which doesn't require you to be fighting for freedom. Although in this case the individual in question believed the ones he was killing were actually some sort of problem/threat but that's beside the point and not worth anything besides noting aside.

[Pokesan]

he's not a terrorist because only browns can be terrorists [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Rogean]

If only there were laws to prevent people from bringing such dangerous weapons into religious establishments, this would never have happened!

Oh wait, there is. (In South Carolina).