extremist muslims get lit up in texas

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Synthlol [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If someone tries to bait you into murdering them without threatening innocent life, it is your responsibility to not murder them.

that's not quite how this works. hate speech to incite imminent violence is not protected speech. honestly, i'm not concerned for either party here. darwinism, imo. i just don't want to hear about an explosion that killed innocent civilians not even affiliated with a hate group because the muslims also blew up a near-by building.

not to mention that this event took place in a school.

[Synthlol]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And obviously the religious men with assault rifles didn't rise to the occasion. You can't impose your sense of morality on fanatics.

True, but being free means you stand up for yourself, that you don't let the threat of violence control you. It's what this country was founded on. Telling these men they can't hold a convention that radicals see as grounds for a shooting spree is conceding that it's okay to go on a shooting spree over a cartoon. They are not responsible for these two men showing up with AK-47's and opening fire on innocent people. The men who showed up with AK-47's are. Being free means not being a pussy. Samoht is advocating the opposite - letting the threat of violence control your actions. Or as I like to call it, being a pussy.

[Pokesan]

This is America. We can antagonize anyone we want. Fuck you.

[Cecily]

Freedom, freedom, Murica. They instigated a situation which put innocent lives at risk, knowing full well this had a high probability of happening.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thank you samoht. i got a good laugh out of how dumb you are.

[Synthlol]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that's not quite how this works. hate speech to incite imminent violence is not protected speech.

Muslims have zero right to impose their beliefs on non-Muslims. Doing so with the threat of violence should not be tolerated under any circumstances.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Freedom, freedom, Murica. They instigated a situation which put innocent lives at risk, knowing full well this had a high probability of happening.

High probability? Has this happened before?

[jarshale]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

High probability? Has this happened before?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by jarshale [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting

Right. Was the blood of the civilians on the hands of the shooters, or the cartoonists?

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Right. Was the blood of the civilians on the hands of the shooters, or the cartoonists?

Obviously on the shooters, Cecily is just a retard