New OOA Non-aggression agreement

[jpetrick]

Current agreement proposal - don't kill OoAs, click air. Seems pretty clear.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by jpetrick [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Current agreement proposal - don't kill OoAs, click air. Seems pretty clear.

The whole point of a Noble agreement is to NOT click air vs 200 people.

Taken is agreeing to not kill Overseers with the hopes that the click fests end and we can stop wasting so many Sky ports ( I think all guilds can agree to that ). If all Indignation wants is to keep Overseers up so that we click fest everyday then no TY, one click fest a week is plenty

Taken is ready for a true agreement to be in place if we want to rid the server of this click fest ( 185 people were up there last week Elzhi )


also I completely understand that Noble distribution and the 'Dont Kill Overseer' are two separate entities and agreements. I clearly remember a big problem in the past with getting an agreement as simple as "Dont kill OoA" in place due to the complicated Noble sharing.

I am fine with agreeing to this initial proposal by Argh with the good faith understanding that some form of Noble sharing will be also coming in the future. Just trying to make our position clear.

[Pan]

Does Doljobob still want a Sky slot? That may be a good start.

Cloki - Omni

[Ella`Ella]

I think I said this in the last post, that TMO will agree to not kill Overseers of Air, but we will not sign the agreement which binds us to it at the moment.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think I said this in the last post, that TMO will agree to not kill Overseers of Air, but we will not sign the agreement which binds us to it at the moment.

this is more of a filibuster than anything I wrote

Taken is the not the guild you need to convince to get this agreement done.

Shift your focus on the guilds that:

A. Havnt commented - Lord Bob, Divinity etc
B. Guilds that have clearly said they agree to not agreeing to an agreement ( lol mouthful )

[jpetrick]

I'll take that over what we have now. What Unbrella said is at least an improvement over the current situation.

[jpetrick]

I see Divinity signed already. Has their position changed?

[Ella`Ella]

Play nice, you two.

[Ella`Ella]

Why would I sign an agreement that allows server staff to punish me for breaking it when I can just as easily happily follow the agreement you guys want and always reserve the right to break the agreement consequence free (not that we would)?

Keep in mind, Erati - TMO never broke the agreement either time. We have Taken and IB to thank for that. So when criticizing, please shift your focus away from the Class-C guild that willingly respected the agreement to begin with.

[jpetrick]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would I sign an agreement that allows server staff to punish me for breaking it when I can just as easily happily follow the agreement you guys want and always reserve the right to break the agreement consequence free (not that we would)?

Keep in mind, Erati - TMO never broke the agreement either time. We have Taken and IB to thank for that. So when criticizing, please shift your focus away from the Class-C guild that willingly respected the agreement to begin with.

Fuckin' a, there we go. I'll take Unbrella's word. He has never given me problems when I had to interact with him and I will put my confidence in his guild upholding the agreement as long as he is an officer.