Guild Drama Review - Tiggles

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Fuddwin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is it me or does anyone else chuckle a bit when "clown" is added to the end of a sentence?

Poor Notserp (Variety)

[Shiftin]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm saying that how you arrived at such a statement is stupid, and I'm absolutely correct about that. We have a roster that is whatever percent larger than yours. You can't reasonably infer anything about our average numbers versus yours because of that.

We could be fielding the exact same numbers every single raid yet drawing from a roster five times the size of yours. (5x the people, 1/5 the raids each)

I know it's really difficult, Shiftin - keep thinking about it and you'll get it.

Except... that's not at all what is happening, and "your people" are claiming the opposite.

Which is more likely, that your significantly larger roster AND people who have attended a raid in the last two weeks are not correlated to the average size of your raid, or that they are?

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Pheer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

youve been gone almost a month and main a shaman, has anything youve ever done on a raid mattered?

Says the SK main.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Shiftin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would you think those things aren't included for both guilds? You think we both don't give attendance points for the same type of raids? That we don't raid sky? The numbers are directly comparable.

Come on, you look ridiculous arguing a point like this. You have a shit ton more active raiders than we do, period.

Do you give attendance points for tracking? Do you give attendance points for responding but not making it to the raid?

You look kind of stupid arguing a point like this if you can't see that a member being at a raid is different than a member not being at a raid. The problem is you used DKP as the basis for your statistics. You made a bad choice and are knowing digging your hole deeper.

Also, I agree we have more active raiders... but again that doesn't determine a sheer number at a raid(s). We have a larger pool to pick from we can have 150 people with 20% attendance and you could have 90 active raiders with 90% attendance. Your method is flawed if you don't see that you are either obstinate or ignorant.

[Archalen]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are confused! Which is hilarious considering your post.

I might say the same about you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Shiftin]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you give attendance points for tracking?

Yep

Do you give attendance points for responding but not making it to the raid?

yep. respond and on the way and you're given the benefit of the doubt.

You look kind of stupid arguing a point like this if you can't see that a member being at a raid is different than a member not being at a raid. The problem is you used DKP as the basis for your statistics. You made a bad choice and are knowing digging your hole deeper.

Also, I agree we have more active raiders... but again that doesn't determine a sheer number at a raid(s). We have a larger pool to pick from we can have 150 people with 20% attendance and you could have 90 active raiders with 90% attendance. Your method is flawed if you don't see that you are either obstinate or ignorant.

... have you been at your own raids? you had 70 people in VP last week. 70.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Shiftin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yep

yep. respond and on the way and you're given the benefit of the doubt.




... have you been at your own raids? you had 70 people in VP last week. 70.

Repop?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Repop?

Jeez not to mention you take a singular instance (esp a repop) and try to claim it as a whole that is just prime logical fallacy. Your brain is disgusting.

Proof we evolved from apes.

[Detoxx]

Doubled quoted. Pheer clearly has his jimmies rustled.

Originally Posted by Pheer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

wipe to nexona AGAIN. Thats exactly what i was saying about you wiping to the hard dragons.

You seem to be mistaken, as we didn't attempt nexona before we left because we knew that IF you could kill it, we'd at least be back in time for another attempt. It was a gamble, but a good one IMO.

Aren't you guys supposed to be sitting 2 FD classes on Draco again? lol...get them widdershits bro...

[quido]

So what?

raiding is fun