Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:59 PM
Bossman Bossman is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just want to state one thing for the guilds that are clearly upset with this. If a large amount of guilds who already aren't getting raid targets don't like this, veto it and if the big 3 aren't willing to budge on this, they will be the ones losing targets.

The majority of the server already aren't getting raid targets, so in a way you have been raid suspended for the past few years. You guys have the upper hand here, don't let this blindside you and force you to make a rash decision by agreeing because there is the raid suspension deadline.
^^ this ^^
  #82  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:00 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

Need to change it to the slaying of a VP Dragon, not just the attempt. Being penalized from other raid targets doesn't help you grow into a guild that can actually compete. it just keeps those on top from having to worry about loosing anything in VP once again.
  #83  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:01 PM
Ecguy Ecguy is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OK, thank you. Realized how rude my post was after I submitted, so thank you for your polite response.

Would the GMs consider an agreement without TMO and/or FEIB's approval if BDA, Taken, AG, Europa, Divinity, etc. are all on board? Seems like at this point, FEIB and TMO might pull some Republican bullshit and shut everything down if we don't agree to their terms.
Excluding the most hardcore raiders would have a lot of unintended consequences to any agreement. And it wouldn't really be an agreement either.
  #84  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:02 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just want to state one thing for the guilds that are clearly upset with this. If a large amount of guilds who already aren't getting raid targets don't like this, veto it and if the big 3 aren't willing to budge on this, they will be the ones losing targets.

The majority of the server already aren't getting raid targets, so in a way you have been raid suspended for the past few years. You guys have the upper hand here, don't let this blindside you and force you to make a rash decision by agreeing because there is the raid suspension deadline.
I can live with not raiding a month if it means fixing a one sided proposal like this.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #85  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:02 PM
Turp_SmokinPurp Turp_SmokinPurp is offline
Kobold

Turp_SmokinPurp's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The only concession I would try to make if I wasn't a 'category A' guild would be to drop inny and fay to de-prioritized targets.
This should already be in the writing. Or people sending tells to these leaders to get it wrote up.
I agree. Even if its just Inny one month an fay the next (back an forth). They are getting tons of raid mobs left up with this proposal. Way more than before , and it gives every lower guild a big chance at mobs. + they have the chance to steal our mobs still too.
But for some reason it just seems like nothing but a full blown rotation (forced by GM's) will make these people happy.
__________________

Turp --- Purp
60 Shm 60 Wiz
Last edited by Turp_SmokinPurp; 12-30-2013 at 09:24 PM..
  #86  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:03 PM
phacemeltar phacemeltar is offline
Planar Protector

phacemeltar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: western hemisphere
Posts: 1,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, you guys all need to agree on something. As per Sirken's post, if an agreement isn't reached by the 2nd, everyone is raid suspended until you do.

We aren't going to 'sanction' anything until everyone is in agreement.
plz ban them
__________________
  #87  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:04 PM
Pullyn Pullyn is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I can live with not raiding a month if it means fixing a one sided proposal like this.
+1
  #88  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:04 PM
Pheer Pheer is offline
Fire Giant

Pheer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 858
Default

So what Im getting from this so far is that some of you want to hold the raid scene hostage to force some kind of calendar rotation or communist russia mob rationing system, while simultaneously accusing TMO and IB/FE of stacking the deck to favor themselves. Ok cool.
  #89  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:04 PM
Bossman Bossman is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turp_SmokinPurp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This should already be in the writing. Or people sending tells to these leaders to get it wrote up.
I agree. Even if its just Inny one month an fay the next (back an forth). They are getting tons of raid mobs left up with this proposal. Way more than before , and it gives every lower guild a big chance at mobs.
But for some reason it just seems like nothing but a full blown rotation (forced by GM's) will make these people happy.
Hard to complete other epic without VS. Maybe "these people" are tired of a small percentage of server population telling is what we can and cannot do.
  #90  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:04 PM
happyhappy happyhappy is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 482
Default

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=81892

Why is anything outside of VP in Priority class again?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanras View Post
Fixed, pending update.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.