HE WALKS

[Malice_Mizer]

Also, to everyone talking about riots and other nonsense:

The norm for the black community is to not riot in the face of grave injustice. That you look at Rodney King and say that it somehow represents an expectation is disgusting. It propagates the narrative that ran through the Zimmerman case-- that black people are to be FEARED by the larger white community, and that they exist somewhere outside of our civil society and therefore must be dealt with in the same capacity.

It's pathetic.

[The Situation]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, to everyone talking about riots and other nonsense:

The norm for the black community is to not riot in the face of grave injustice. That you look at Rodney King and say that it somehow represents an expectation is disgusting. It propagates the narrative that ran through the Zimmerman case-- that black people are to be FEARED by the larger white community, and that they exist somewhere outside of our civil society and therefore must be dealt with in the same capacity.

It's pathetic.

Indeed. Black men riot about as often as they raise their kids.

[Aeolwind]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, to everyone talking about riots and other nonsense:

The norm for the black community is to not riot in the face of grave injustice. That you look at Rodney King and say that it somehow represents an expectation is disgusting. It propagates the narrative that ran through the Zimmerman case-- that black people are to be FEARED by the larger white community, and that they exist somewhere outside of our civil society and therefore must be dealt with in the same capacity.

It's pathetic.

Well, they did start rioting in California.

http://twitchy.com/2013/07/14/kill-p...t-photosvideo/

[Gadwen]

Originally Posted by Aeolwind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, they did start rioting in California.

http://twitchy.com/2013/07/14/kill-p...t-photosvideo/

I think the flag burning at the McDonalds was a response to the latest overtly racist McChicken commercial.

[Aeolwind]

Originally Posted by Gadwen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think the flag burning at the McDonalds was a response to the latest overtly racist McChicken commercial.

How did I miss that commercial? I need to go find it so I can be all incensed that a pretty evil company is making fun of my ethnicity again.

[Alawen]

Here is a story of a black man who shot an unarmed white teenager: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/ny...ial.html?_r=3&. You're going to read this story and think, "Oh, that's different." You're going to rationalize how in this case there was an onus on the black man to exercise restraint.

That is because you are a racist.

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is a story of a black man who shot an unarmed white teenager: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/ny...ial.html?_r=3&. You're going to read this story and think, "Oh, that's different." You're going to rationalize how in this case there was an onus on the black man to exercise restraint.

That is because you are a racist.

The only difference is this murderer was convicted, where the murderer were all talking about here was set free. nothing to do with convict black murderers and let white murderers roam free here.

True justice served in the article above, a true joke what happened yesterday.

[Kraftwerk]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only difference is this murderer was convicted, where the murderer were all talking about here was set free. nothing to do with convict black murderers and let white murderers roam free here.

True justice served in the article above, a true joke what happened yesterday.

You really think that is the only difference between those two stories? Like, genuinely you believe that 100% to be truth?

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Kraftwerk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You really think that is the only difference between those two stories? Like, genuinely you believe that 100% to be truth?

ha no its a little different shooting a drunk kid in the face thats looking for a fight than "defending yourself"

I use quotes because, no one knows what happened we simply have to take zimmermans word for it.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is a story of a black man who shot an unarmed white teenager: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/ny...ial.html?_r=3&. You're going to read this story and think, "Oh, that's different." You're going to rationalize how in this case there was an onus on the black man to exercise restraint.

That is because you are a racist.

You are correct that there are people here who are blinded by race and racism in this thread. I suggest you take a look at all of these threads and take inventory of which posts bring up race and which posts are simply responding to such race-infused posts.

I realize you are incapable of learning anything due to your mule-like stubbornness so I'll spell it out for you. You, HBB and your ilk with your white-guilt thumping and your constantly calling out racial injustice where there is none and blaming the white man at every opportunity are the real racists here and you are only perpetuating the problem.

You compare these two cases, I honestly thought you were trolling. Let's say the teenagers had broken into Mr. White's house and then he shot them, this would be grounds for self-defense.

Instead of trying to calm the unarmed teenagers, or simply locking his doors and waiting for the police, Mr. White grabbed an unlicensed pistol and stormed out of his house to confront the teenagers

Let's say they attacked him first on his property rather then backing down after having a gun pulled on them and he fired for fear of his life.

Mr. White fanned the gun menacingly at each teenager and that Daniel did not lunge, but rather defiantly slapped the gun away, with Mr. White retraining it on him, then shooting him point-blank in the face.

Let's say Mr. White had properly registered his gun and had the license to carry/own/operate it.

The man, John H. White, 54, was guilty of the second-degree manslaughter charge that prosecutors had sought, and of criminal possession of a weapon.

Mr. White admitted in court that he had not hunted in years and that the Beretta was unlicensed.

None of those things happened.

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only difference is this murderer was convicted, where the murderer were all talking about here was set free. nothing to do with convict black murderers and let white murderers roam free here.

True justice served in the article above, a true joke what happened yesterday.

The first part of this post is again racially charged, the second part of the post is accurate, the third part is backwards as what happened yesterday was the end of a joke that had gone on for far too long.

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Racist.

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yes, yes you are.

I still don't think he gets it.