POP dropping by the day since xp decrease

[Nirgon]

100% per kill (Mob base 100xp let's say, so 200)
75% kill (175)
Difference of 25% per kill? (25 xp)

Stop derailing, we may have gotten Nizzar to bat phone no more forum posting today.

(can't tell you usrs, responding in kind)

[Nuncio]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Isn't a 100% bonus only 60% faster than a 25% bonus? (2.0 - 1.25) / 1.25 = 0.6

It's just four times the bonus, but you still got that first 1.0 no matter what.

This is what my 'wut' was for.

[heartbrand]

I still get two blues a quad in 35 on my wiz. There's no way that's with only a 25% exp bonus. Scaling must be in.

[Tomatoking]

i made a char today , and once i dinged level 2 macroquest told me i was getting 2.9% exp per monster average ( Blue mobs )

logged immediately : )

[vouss]

I really don't feel scaling is in at the moment

[Galacticus]

Anyone with a character level 50+ should be exempt from even commenting. This isn't even about them.

IF THERE IS MORE XP = MORE PEOPLE PLAY = MORE LOW LEVELS CHARACTERS ARE CREATED

These arguments against XP rising are such nonsense.

You want low end pvp to thrive yet you play 50+ characters.

You are afraid population will dwindle if more xp is added, but it already has dwindled and continues.

You want xp to stay classic but the thirty other non classic things are fine.

You want to keep low end pvp yet there is no low end pvp to keep.

[Galacticus]

Originally Posted by Rettii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hijinx your basically saying the server shoul be 50-60 only with no new players and no low end game. That would mean pop does nothing but decay down to 30 again.

HERP DERP DERP ALERT!

There are already 90+ nihilum members logging on to raid. You forget about them? Do they all disappear when the xp is increased because they been waiting to roll their mega twinks with the new xp bonus?

[Galacticus]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like that EXP is slower here, because it forces you to take your character seriously and not just level throw away train chars etc., on the other hand obviously due to the low pop it's very hard to level. I think a nice balance would be either a grouping balance to encourage group play rather than SoloQuest OR low-mid level hot zones.

HERP DERP HERP ALERT!

No it doesnt force you to take anything seriously. The time you spent in this game revolves around your REAL life first.

Not all players are created equally, someone might have hundreds of hours to waste. On eq, on starcraft, shooting squirls out back, growing tomatoes.

Others have to find time and move shit around in their real lives to play. Those people who cant spare as much time take their characters more serious then the guy who doesnt give a shit where his time goes.

Leveling time does not equal commitment to a character or prevent throw away train characters from the tomato growers with too much time.

[Jenni D]

i cant believe someone with several level 60s including an SK, with HUGE combined /played times & a vicious attitude towards ethnic minorities has labelled Samwise a "waste of breath".

This is the same Samwise who has done more for server noobs than anyone else, organised the foundations of the current competition you have and "crave", loving father and husband and very casual gamer (his priorities are correct)

[Jenni D]

im honestly gobsmacked.

some of you #grownassadults need to wake up to reality