NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Landroval]

That old trope. "We're the smartest humans that ever existed and everyone else is a moron" trope.

Yet, despite the arrogance of the premise, and the assertion that Christianity "held back" the technological advancement of the world, despite founding all of the institutions of higher learning, and the fact that essentially all of the great enlightenment thinkers were Christians, we still have that pesky issue of the supersymmetry of the cosmological model built upon Christianic premises to this day, simply referred to as "the Logos" some 2000+ years later.

In a chaotic self-organizing universe, why are there left-hand and right-hand neutrinos and left hand and right hand anti neutrinos?

Why is there "dissonance" between electronic and phononic forms of energy transferrence? Why do photons necessarily require an antithesis in gravitons?

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Basing ones life on the writings of barely literate arabs is a tad insane dontcha fink? I mean sure, I love me a good story but really, the more we actually learnt about the world, the less sense the buyble made. Heretics became scholars of note, the christian faith kept back scientific advancement to protect the sanctity of the "book". Those people who claimed talk of a heliocentric universe was heresy are some of the "they" which you asked about earlier. Although the people change over the centuries, its still the same old schtick. Keepem down and stoopid. Easier to make them comply.

Copernicus and Galileo were both Catholic.

(Don't yell at me G, it's just easier this way)

[aussenseiter]

*Which was the style at the time

[arvidez]

haha "barely literate" hahahaha is that whorza? barely literate arabs. guys, i think whorza might be a supremist.

[Duik]

Kept control of the higher learning institutes. There is a difference.
Einstein also was religious. It seems its a personal thing. /shrugs
Its the controlling part that the catholic church did that made simple people think they agreed with it. Many proofs done by science at the time proved a couple buyble stuff to be redundant. So, as a form af damage control they took the reigns (with the tithe money gifted to them) to steer it in directions that agreed with da book.
I know this is not going to help.

[arvidez]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't take advice on spiritualism or marxism from non-believers but thank you

might be Lord Jesus you just ignored. if you feel right, you are probably wrong.

[arvidez]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That old trope. "We're the smartest humans that ever existed and everyone else is a moron" trope.

Yet, despite the arrogance of the premise, and the assertion that Christianity "held back" the technological advancement of the world, despite founding all of the institutions of higher learning, and the fact that essentially all of the great enlightenment thinkers were Christians, we still have that pesky issue of the supersymmetry of the cosmological model built upon Christianic premises to this day, simply referred to as "the Logos" some 2000+ years later.

In a chaotic self-organizing universe, why are there left-hand and right-hand neutrinos and left hand and right hand anti neutrinos?

Why is there "dissonance" between electronic and phononic forms of energy transferrence? Why do photons necessarily require an antithesis in gravitons?

could it be hmmmm, SATAN?!

[Toxigen]

its da jooz

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

its da jooz christians

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's an interesting fact about the Early Church that is, essentially entirely overlooked.

Why was James the Just, Jesus' Brother, and the head of the Christian Church in Jerusalem, up until he was murdered by the Pharisee High Priest Ananus Ben Ananus, allowed to go into the Holy of the Holies and perform the annual scapegoat sacrifice rituals outlined in Leviticus 16, on Yom Kippur for nearly 3 decades after his initial fleeing to the caves of Qumran that Saul of Tarsus was dispatched to to exterminate him at "on the road to Damascus"?

Note, Simon Peter was officially the High Priest of Christendom at this time and the bylaws of pharisaism at this time, reflective of Torah Law, specifically prohibit anyone whatsoever from entering the holy of holies except for the high priest.

Why was James allowed to enter it for the atonement sacrifices?

I reiterate, "why was James the Just allowed to enter the Holy of Holies for atonement sacrifices?"