FE knowingly KS's TMO's Trak, Rushes to complete keys and Epics

[47shadesofgay]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

FIFY

[kotton05]

I think the true issue is this happening in the past without recourse. I know it happened with Inny/VS when FC got him. There is no real solution aside from the FTE shout that I can think of aside from a GM intervention moments after the kill.

Why you so concerned over this incident? Isn't this just another case of who had FTE being to late and not who got to keep guts....

Trak is almost as bad as Dojo now.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by 47shadesofgay [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Will you shut the fuck up?

This is not a court room, and you're barking up the wrong tree. Either open up the thread in the appropriate place and risk looking stupid, or go away.

Nobody but you is caring this much.

My my, I think I struck a nerve.

Hush now, the grown ups are trying to talk.

[kotton05]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

rnf can and will get real ignantttt

[47shadesofgay]

You didn't strike a nerve, you're just making an ass out of yourself.

If you honestly care that much about taking away somebodies epic and the manner in which "conflict" resolution occurs on this server, then post about it where somebody cares, not at the tail-end of a 90 page RnF thread.

Spend your time trying to enforce it, not seeking out proof one way or another before you make an ass out of yourself publically outside of RnF. Nobody but you cares that much about your own image, and I speak for everyone else when I tell you that nobody cares.

The grown-up bit is cute by the by, I'll believe you're a grown-up the day you put that thesauras down, take off your suit, stop lawyering and post your opinions publically if you have such a fervent conviction.

[falkun]

I can see your argument that Xanthias' epic falls under estoppel and is not a good precedent for the other instances it has been applied to. But this is RNF, not Server Chat nor petitions/exploits.

I will repeat that this precedent, rightfully applied or not, has benefitted TMO as well. I doubt the VS wiz staff won by BDA was ever removed from TMO, which would lead to an expansion of the Xanthias' precedent to non-estoppel cases. If you feel the expansion of the Xanthias precedent is in error, I suggest you submit a petition.

[Tiggles]

FE known exploiters and MQ users

[falkun]

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

FE known exploiters and MQ users

TMO finally get a (specific) mob? You're allowed to bash them again? (not flaming, honestly curious).

[47shadesofgay]

Falkun you seem intelligent, so it surprises me that you would even attempt replying to frieza, when it is so very obvious what exactly it is he is attempting to do. Even mav picked up on it.

I must say freiza is usually right on about a lot of things, but the way he is going about this is the most weasly, and lawyer-like thing I have seen in a long time.

If he has such strong feelings and truly cares about conflict resolution in the future, I suggest he take his argument elsewhere and seek to go about it via other means.

Otherwise, he can keep casting his line. I hope nobody nibbles one way or another.

[falkun]

Xasten is arguing the Xanthias precedent doesn't apply here. I'm arguing its not for him to decide, and that if he is correctly lawyering about incorrect precedent, that a new, applicable precedent that hasn't been discussed does exist, and has existed to his guild's benefit before it possibly benefits FE in this case. I also reiterate he's barking up the wrong tree, again, because he still seems to be missing the memo.