If you believe in god, you're an idiot...

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by Slathar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

burden of proof is on you, not us. you've proven nothing except that you don't understand what a theory is and are insufferably smug about being stupid.

please continue entertaining us kiddo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Slathar, you don't even matter ITT. You are just trolling and offer nothing. You have proven that you don't know anything at all...nada. nothing. You talk about being amusing and entertaining...lmao. And you must be really old to think a 39 year old is a kid. NEXT ! !

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Disproving the bible makes as much sense as disproving The Lord of the Rings.

Prove Mordor isn't real. Go ahead.

Oh, wait, that's right. It's not possible to prove a negative.

Now what about "Closed System", "True Christians not killing in Christianity's name", "The bible verses" someone wanted explained...etc?


I am waiting. Got nothing? Thought so.

[Boggwin Bramblefoot]

Well, I am off for the day. Got to catch a flight. Have fun. I will pray for you all. Jesus be with you.

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, I am off for the day. Got to catch a flight. Have fun. I will pray for you all. Jesus be with you.

thats code that his grandma needs to use the trailer's only computer

[guineapig]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would normally agree, but it was getting painful seeing these people keep replying to my post. It was like watching a little bird that kept flying into a window pane. Eventually you need to tell the poor thing that there is a window there or it will just keep doing it...haha.

You all been trolled...

[Henini]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not usually one to quote wikipedia, but I also don't know French history that well.



Did these people kill in the name of atheism?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Terror

I stand corrected I guess.

But we both know clergy was pushing it's fat aggression on people. They revolted and tried getting rid of them. For the right to not burn at the stake for not going around treating every clergymen as gods.

in other words, they had it coming.

but like I said, I stand corrected.

[chtulu]

The temptation [to attribute the appearance of a design to actual design itself] is a false one, because the designer hypothesis immediately raises the larger problem of who designed the designer.

The whole problem we started out with was the problem of explaining statistical improbability. It is obviously no solution to postulate something even more improbable.

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?

Also, here are 4 points that I'm sure the faithful will enjoy huffing about.


1. Atheists can be happy, balanced, moral, and intellectually fulfilled.

2. Natural selection and similar scientific theories are superior to a "God hypothesis" —the illusion of intelligent design— in explaining the living world and the cosmos.

3. Children should not be labelled by their parents' religion. Terms like "Catholic child" or "Muslim child" should make people cringe.

4. Atheists should be proud, not apologetic, because atheism is evidence of a healthy, independent mind.

[Harrison]

Originally Posted by chtulu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The temptation [to attribute the appearance of a design to actual design itself] is a false one, because the designer hypothesis immediately raises the larger problem of who designed the designer.

The whole problem we started out with was the problem of explaining statistical improbability. It is obviously no solution to postulate something even more improbable.

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?

Also, here are 4 points that I'm sure the faithful will enjoy huffing about.


1. Atheists can be happy, balanced, moral, and intellectually fulfilled.

2. Natural selection and similar scientific theories are superior to a "God hypothesis" —the illusion of intelligent design— in explaining the living world and the cosmos.

3. Children should not be labelled by their parents' religion. Terms like "Catholic child" or "Muslim child" should make people cringe.

4. Atheists should be proud, not apologetic, because atheism is evidence of a healthy, independent mind.

You're not fucking intelligent.

You're just DIRECTLY copy/pasting Wikipedia in an attempt to sound smart. You are essentially a brainless slob.

You're too dumb to take part in this debate/discussion so get the fuck out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Delusion

Originally Posted by Wikipedia

At the end of chapter 4, Why there almost certainly is no God, Dawkins sums up his argument and states, "The temptation [to attribute the appearance of a design to actual design itself] is a false one, because the designer hypothesis immediately raises the larger problem of who designed the designer. The whole problem we started out with was the problem of explaining statistical improbability. It is obviously no solution to postulate something even more improbable."[20] In addition, chapter 4 asserts that the alternative to the designer hypothesis is not chance, but natural selection.

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by chtulu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?

Yes.

1. Atheists can be happy, balanced, moral, and intellectually fulfilled.

'The Faithful' can be happy, balanced, moral, and intellectually-fulfilled.

2. Natural selection and similar scientific theories are superior to a "God hypothesis" —the illusion of intelligent design— in explaining the living world and the cosmos.

Natural selection and similar scientific theories can go hand in hand with intelligent design. People can believe in science as well as a God.

3. Children should not be labelled by their parents' religion. Terms like "Catholic child" or "Muslim child" should make people cringe.

By that same note, children shouldn't be labeled by their parent's finances. Terms like "Middle class child", "Upper class child", should make people cringe as well.

4. Atheists should be proud, not apologetic, because atheism is evidence of a healthy, independent mind.

The evidence of a healthy, independent mind is a healthy, independent mind.

[Harrison]

Reformatting what you copy/pasted in an attempt to look like you wrote it yourself, fucking fail.