the i dont care about politics anymore thread

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think saying 'growth bad' is a great electoral strategy, populist. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude growth ain't good right now. Maybe if the drug traffickers buy a billion sandwiches you'll be proven right in some alternate reality somewhere dunno

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes I am. Illegal immigrants buying sandwiches doesn't meaningfully contribute to GDP, especially when you take into account how much they often detract from it.

If some fentanyl smuggler buys a sandwich, it's not going to offset the loss from the legal US citizen(s) who died from his fentanyl-laced fake percocet pill, and will thus never contribute to GDP again.

You also totally ignored the point about your house having borders. Why should your house have closed borders, but the country should have open borders? (which is a misnomer, we DO have open borders, you just aren't allowed to sneak accross in the middle of the night in some random part of the desert).

How is it the immigrants fault you did drugs and overdosed? Lib.

I didn't see that argument, but now that I have - sovereign states are not physical buildings. I hope that clears things up for you.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude growth ain't good right now. Maybe if the drug traffickers buy a billion sandwiches you'll be proven right in some alternate reality somewhere dunno

Who's fault is that? The people engaging in economic interactions in the country. The only way forward is to increase the number of interactions by increasing the number of people making them.

I guess you could also invent a new market of women posting their butthole pics online, but you're too moral for that arent ya. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who's fault is that? The people engaging in economic interactions in the country. The only way forward is to increase the number of interactions by increasing the number of people making them.

I guess you could also invent a new market of women posting their butthole pics online, but you're too moral for that arent ya. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

bro i'm tryin to help you. but you stubborn and don't know economics

you flood the market with cheap labor wages go down. you print a ton of monopoly money inflation goes up. you take a dump on your ability to increase your own energy supply and rely on iron sheiks in the desert gas prices go way up. it's called stagflation dude. opening the border and sellin sandwiches aint gonna fix that

you so low iq man

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

bro i'm tryin to help you. but you stubborn and don't know economics

you flood the market with cheap labor wages go down. you print a ton of monopoly money inflation goes up. you take a dump on your ability to increase your own energy supply and rely on iron sheiks in the desert gas prices go way up. it's called stagflation dude. opening the border and sellin sandwiches aint gonna fix that

you so low iq man

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[nostalgiaquest]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You mean because you're obsessed with quibbling over semantics? Please tell me the scientific definition of the term "a lot".

I invoke the term "a lot" because A LOT of democrats don't like biden. "A lot" does not mean "the majority of". Understand?

I did this with whale biologist too. He asked for a source that ivermectin exhibited anti-viral properties (as many drugs do), I linked him to a completely legitimate scientific paper, and he admitted he didn't even read it. What's the point? Real aristotle level shit itt.

I think you use phrases like "a lot" because you think they make your arguments stronger. But in fact when the things you say are so easily disproved, it makes the rest of the things you say questionable as well. Like I said, that's emotional junior high school debate level shit.

Kinda like a few pages back when you said practically everyone is the world wants to move to America. And I said nuh uh, here's why I disagree with that, and you responded "yeah well Mexicans do!" Like that was some big gotcha moment. And I'm pretty sure we had a similar moment even further back about how the vast majority of medical professionals are vaccinated, and recommend you get vaccinated. I'm too lazy to go find it, but I member.

The point i'm trying to make here is that if you stop saying exaggerated dumb shit, people might listen to the smart things you say, few and far between as they may be. I'm trying to help you step up your debate game dawg. You obviously care a lot about this stuff.

Anyways, bed time for me. Stay crazy.

[robayon]

might as well be talking about the meyers-briggs test, it means just as much as an IQ test... which is to say, very little

anyone who thinks scientists of any stripe use IQ tests has obviously been paid by Big Pharma to do so

i'm an ENFP, at least last time i was forced to take that nonsense test

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I did this with whale biologist too. He asked for a source that ivermectin exhibited anti-viral properties (as many drugs do), I linked him to a completely legitimate scientific paper, and he admitted he didn't even read it. What's the point? Real aristotle level shit itt.

As I recall, this is regarding me pasting from the link he provided "does not show a conclusive positive relation to Covid recovery" or some sciencey-crap like that.

This goon rewrites history everytime I dunk him. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As I recall, this is regarding me pasting from the link he provided "does not show a conclusive positive relation to Covid recovery" or some sciencey-crap like that.

This goon rewrites history everytime I dunk him. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haha "dunk". "Does not show a conclusive positive relation" is a pretty positive result for a study. Notice they didn't say "shows no positive relation at all", which they would have if it didn't.

It also didn't find any significant risk of using it, it has an extremely safe safety profile at normal human doses. It's worth studying, but you bizarrely root against it actively, for no apparent reason. It's weird.

[Jibartik]

Money supply went up 40% this last year and so did the SNP 500.

What does that mean?

It means that the "stockmarket is at reccord highs" is not true, it just means that every penny that was saved or went to covid releif went into the stockmarket, so none of it is value generated all of it is printed money inflation.

lolz You may think this has no affect on you, but I really hope you have no important family that are retired and living off savings or investments (or I hope they get 15% interest on those investmetns (they wont)


For the next year if you dont make 15% interest on everything you have you're losing money lol

If you have family that is not working, they are going to lose everything they currently have so get ready for them to move in!