Enchanter charm isn't classic, we all know this

[bubur]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also interesting if we look at the early TLP servers, which were absolutely dominated by Mages.

We're seeing the same thing here with Chanters instead!

i dont know why people keep saying this

do a /who all count on each class and its clear that druids run green/teal. and its not by a little bit either

could we at least be a little bit factual on page 82? we can go back to repeating imp protector and "muh well mages got nerfed" rhetoric right after that. im sure the staff care very much about these important points and are working on combing through the 80 pages as we speak

[sentinel]

Enchanter charm seems to be way different than classic, what gives?

"Shut up, it's fine."

Well maybe change it to be like classic?

"Shut up, it is classic."

How do you know?

"I don't know, no one does. Even Daybreak doesn't know. That said, it is perfect and classic."

Well imps and snakes are tanking raid mobs. That wasn't classic was it? And secondary to that, chanters are camping group spawn points. Remember when in classic in Guk and Sol B there were groups for many named spawn points?

"Shut up, you just can't handle that people have better internet and wikis to do things people weren't doing on live."

Even if that is true, which it probably isn't given the amount of obsessive class boards that used to exit back then, is this good for the Green/Teal to have tank/dps classes being completely sidelined?

"Yes, Green/Teal is an EQ museum which does not account for your feels or interest in balancing the game. Deal with it."

Then why do we have early FS dagger nerfs, clickable items links, whirl til you hurl nerfs, bard swarming nerfs, etc?

"While not classic, those changes were because those were in the interest of game balance and player feels. Makes total sense."

[bubur]

^ nice imagination

c u in the bug thread

[Not_Mikeo]

This really has been one of the dumbest threads...

Something not classic? Find some evidence and make a bug post.

Feelings hurt? Go make an RnF post.

[sentinel]

Shit post for a shit poster. cya at 100 pages +

[bubur]

just trying to do my part and keep it from devolving into an echo chamber of unclassic nonsense devoid of evidence and based on the same few people circlejerking about a few hypothetical situations and actually just straight up wrong information

youll thank me someday

[sentinel]

Originally Posted by bubur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

youll thank me someday

Agreed, but that day is today. Thank you for bumping this to the top.

[ArunaGreen]

Originally Posted by bubur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just trying to do my part and keep it from devolving into an echo chamber of unclassic nonsense devoid of evidence and based on the same few people circlejerking about a few hypothetical situations and actually just straight up wrong information

youll thank me someday

If shit like bard aoe'n is nerfed then there is no reason whatsoever that charm shouldn't be nerfed. Chanters being able to solo and duo camps meant for full or near full groups is absurd. Chanters doing half a raids DPS with a single pet is retarded. The spell is in BLATANT need of a nerf. You should not be able to charm a dar ghoul or a protector imp or any other absurdly high powered pet.

[Hazek]

Originally Posted by sentinel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Enchanter charm seems to be way different than classic, what gives?

"Shut up, it's fine."

Well maybe change it to be like classic?

"Shut up, it is classic."

How do you know?

"I don't know, no one does. Even Daybreak doesn't know. That said, it is perfect and classic."

Well imps and snakes are tanking raid mobs. That wasn't classic was it? And secondary to that, chanters are camping group spawn points. Remember when in classic in Guk and Sol B there were groups for many named spawn points?

"Shut up, you just can't handle that people have better internet and wikis to do things people weren't doing on live."

Even if that is true, which it probably isn't given the amount of obsessive class boards that used to exit back then, is this good for the Green/Teal to have tank/dps classes being completely sidelined?

"Yes, Green/Teal is an EQ museum which does not account for your feels or interest in balancing the game. Deal with it."

Then why do we have early FS dagger nerfs, clickable items links, whirl til you hurl nerfs, bard swarming nerfs, etc?

"While not classic, those changes were because those were in the interest of game balance and player feels. Makes total sense."

Server has obvious non-classic changes but if its a change you want then the hypocrites will cry and tell you to stop trying to "streamline" it. And remember, the whole point of p1999 is to recreate bad mechanics!

[Hazek]

Originally Posted by ArunaGreen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If shit like bard aoe'n is nerfed then there is no reason whatsoever that charm shouldn't be nerfed. Chanters being able to solo and duo camps meant for full or near full groups is absurd. Chanters doing half a raids DPS with a single pet is retarded. The spell is in BLATANT need of a nerf. You should not be able to charm a dar ghoul or a protector imp or any other absurdly high powered pet.

Look I want classic Everquest not World of Warcraft. Cause if they nerf that then what's next, making it so bards can only hit 4 mobs? Lol. No thanks. Keep it classic.