Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:12 PM
Black Jesus Black Jesus is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Best Coast
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiker000 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I forgot that humans are the same as rats/mice.
Quoted where I stopped reading because of lunacy denouncing like every clinical trial ever performed.
  #72  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:16 PM
dredge dredge is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiker000 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
and really had nothing to do with "protecting people from GM food" like they were trying to lead people to believe.
like by putting fucking GMO labels on the God damn food?
  #73  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:35 PM
Reiker000 Reiker000 is offline
Kobold

Reiker000's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dredge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
like by putting fucking GMO labels on the God damn food?
This will probably be my last response in this thread because 99% of this forum is fucking retarded and as always, completely unable to grasp the entire picture. I'm just repeating myself over and over to receive "lol tldr u mad?" responses from children. If you want to educate yourself about something, get off Project1999.

But, once again, you're being emotionally blackmailed on an issue. You keep repeating "BUT... BUT GMO IS BAD!" without actually responding to the points of Proposition 37 that are bad.

Here's the third time I'll say this: I am not against a larger amount of transparency on purchasable goods. I think most people can say the same thing.

However, the provisions of the bill are awful. You say "putting fucking GMO labels on the god damn food" like some magic label fairies are going to be placed around California to make sure this shit happens. Do you know who's responsible for "putting fucking GMO labels on the god damn food"? Hint: I've said it at least twice in this thread. Do you know exactly what needs to be labelled? Again, probably not. The proposition is so vague retailers would probably need to label everything, even animals bred via selective breeding, which is harmless "genetic modification" that's been going on for thousands of years.

The entire thing is a big business scare tactic and you're falling for it. Again, fortunately not the entirety of California fell for it.

If this passed, guess what would happen? Costs in local "mom and pop" shops would skyrocket, you'd buy more from Walmart or whatever giant, and those small businesses go out of business. And you probably wouldn't eat any differently.

If a similar bill popped up in my state (New York) which actually put the responsibility on the manufacturer instead of the retailer, actually gave a clear outline on what had to happen, and had sane limitations without driving up the costs of food, then sure, I'd probably vote for it. Prop 37 was not that. It was big business takeover veiled in phony science.
__________________
<@patriot1776> i dont even rely on my facial hairs to get laid good luck to you
  #74  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:42 PM
Cypher. Cypher. is offline
Aviak


Join Date: May 2011
Location: Land of Fruits and Nuts
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dredge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm just a guy who has an interest in nutrition. I was a professional Chef for many years. I managed a High School Cafeteria. I traveled to Mongolia as a consultant and Chef instructor, where I opened a upscale Western Restaurant and trained the staff of about 12 restaurants. etc....

I'm currently an IT student studying Information Assurance/ Network Security at a local tech college.

I don't have to be a scientist to care about what is in our food or what my family eats, and I don't think it takes a genius to figure out that there is a correlation between GMO and rising health issues like cancer and allergies.

So I chose to get informed on the issue,
Alright, considering this, I'm going to assume that IRL you're a reasonable guy who has some experience and is on the right-side of the intelligence curve. That said, let me make a few comments:

1. My guess for the resistance from food large companies for the label change is that it will cost an amount of money that they don't want to spend. I work as an engineer in the medical device industry and the requirements for labeling is very clearly laid out, deviation from which can result in the FDA/CADA coming down on you like the wrath of God. That said, changing labels can be a pain in the ass on a smaller scale - now multiple that by all the products these companies have and I can understand their desire not to mess with their labeling.

2. Either you or someone else mentioned that there is a lack of regulation on what is GMO, etc. I would say that this is the largest issue within the field of GE-ing as regulation is the key to safety. Going back to medical devices, I feel no misgivings if I had to have a procedure in the hospital that uses devices due to the field being so heavily regulated as to assure top quality. Like-wise, GMO can be made perfectly safe (assuming nothing to the contrary rigorously disproves this) with proper regulation such as documentation of quantities of chemicals, what genes are being replaced/modified, standard safety testing performed, and proper labeling. With these regulations in place, I can assure you that the regulating agencies (such as the FDA and CADA) will have no qualms about shutting down producers who violate the regulations that will put consumers at risk.

3. In my mind, there are parallels between medicine 150-200 years ago and now to GMO now compared to possibilities in the future. If you will recall, snake oils, unwashed doctors' hands, and pseudoscience were the norm before the good and bad was separated in medicine that in turn gave rise to the beauty that is modern allopathic and osteopathic medicine. Likewise, GMO is in its infancy and should be nurtured in order to better understand which portions are beneficial and which are harmful so that we don't squander the great potential of this relatively new science.

In summary: Push more for standards and regulation and apply rigorous science to reap the benefits of genetic engineering.
  #75  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:45 PM
Reiker000 Reiker000 is offline
Kobold

Reiker000's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 168
Default

^ Culpability for correct labeling was placed on the end retailers and there was no specificity as to what actually needed to be labeled, which would result in over-labeling to cover their asses to a point where it didn't even matter anymore since the whole thing would become diluted with labels about absolutely everything that could be considered "unnatural."
__________________
<@patriot1776> i dont even rely on my facial hairs to get laid good luck to you
  #76  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:46 PM
Spitty Spitty is offline
Fire Giant

Spitty's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 705
Default

What he said.

The astounding thing is not that the proposition didn't pass, it's that there are thousands of ill-informed voters across the country blaming California for making the right decision at this time.

You can link Huffington Post's fancy diagrams all you want, but to the populace that's truly informed on the details of Proposition 37, you're a complete fool. You fell for the straw man argument, and embody the meat-with-eyes mentality that enables larger businesses to make massive capital gains - which they absolutely would have if this proposition passed as it was written.

Thankfully, the larger part of California is smarter than you are, and knows that voting is a much more powerful tool than being informed by colorful Huffington Post diagrams.
__________________
[60 ORACLE] SPITULSKI <The A-Team>
Batmanning today for a better tomorrow.
  #77  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:48 PM
Spitty Spitty is offline
Fire Giant

Spitty's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 705
Default

Good christ, you people post fast here. I was referring to Reiker's second-down post, but Cypher's just as agreeable.
__________________
[60 ORACLE] SPITULSKI <The A-Team>
Batmanning today for a better tomorrow.
  #78  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:53 PM
Reiker000 Reiker000 is offline
Kobold

Reiker000's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 168
Default

We are trained ForumQuest professionals.
__________________
<@patriot1776> i dont even rely on my facial hairs to get laid good luck to you
  #79  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:54 PM
dredge dredge is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiker000 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The entire thing is a big business scare tactic and you're falling for it. Again, fortunately not the entirety of California fell for it.
.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Looks like all these green countries fell for it too.

Look man, it's a world market.
When Hershey sells a candy bar in Europe they don't use GMO's because if they did they would have to label it as such and no one would buy it.

So why should they sell the good stuff in Europe, and sell the GMO poison here in the states?

Because they can and they make more profits.

Why would they spend millions fighting prop 37?
Because it protects their profits and that's the number one priority to them.

That small business labeling burden argument is complete bullshit
  #80  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:55 PM
Reiker000 Reiker000 is offline
Kobold

Reiker000's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 168
Default

Do you fucking read anything?
__________________
<@patriot1776> i dont even rely on my facial hairs to get laid good luck to you
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.