Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 09-27-2012, 03:01 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

You are a dick tater.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #72  
Old 09-27-2012, 04:23 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jburks8 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It was definitely a closer call than I originally thought (due to the whole simultaneous catch and they need definitive evidence to overturn the call on the field), etc., but Tasselhoff, you need to consider the fact that literally all the NFL experts and players/coaches/retired refs around the league (minus Pete Carroll) thought that it was an interception.

Not to mention the fact that coincidentally there was a resolution with the old refs and the NFL within 3 days of the incident... Just seems like they knew they busted the call, they knew that that everyone knew that they busted the call, and that there would almost be a riot if something wasn't done to resolve it.

Now we can all go back to enjoying our Sundays without anarchy!
It was an interception, but at the same time it was a catch. The offensive pass interference WAS obvious, but it is RARELY if ever called in a hail mary pass situation like that. Yep, glad the real refs are back...cause there were certainly bad calls being made, I just don't necessarily think the real referees would have made that packers/seattle call any differently then the "scabs".
  #73  
Old 09-28-2012, 02:30 AM
baramur baramur is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default

In order for sim. Catch oth players must have BOTH hands on the ball, to attain possession. The offensive player had only 1 hand in contact while the defensive player had 2, giving him possession. Whoever has possession is then down by contact when landing, it was an interception. Sim possession never occurs. Because the defensive player had FULL possession first.
  #74  
Old 09-28-2012, 03:25 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baramur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In order for sim. Catch oth players must have BOTH hands on the ball, to attain possession. The offensive player had only 1 hand in contact while the defensive player had 2, giving him possession. Whoever has possession is then down by contact when landing, it was an interception. Sim possession never occurs. Because the defensive player had FULL possession first.
Nope, offensive player had 2 hands on the ball. You just can't see his hand underneath the ball clenched between the defender's chest and the football.
  #75  
Old 09-28-2012, 03:26 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Also -- whoever has posession first matters very little most times.
  #76  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:50 AM
Jacquouille Jacquouille is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That train fraps is so funny, fail monks come into camp and bring all their aggro with them.

You can tell because it kills 2 bda monks first without having to go into seek mode.

Your monks are so awesome, probably grouped with buffers, hell I bet you guys even group them with bards.
Lol, truth.

Tbh, TMO is so used to raiding/organized/experienced (with a core of madbadfat tools who surprisingly are still not bored to death), BDA a semi casual guild that has nearly 0 organization, 20% of the experience TMO has....

David vs Goliath =(
  #77  
Old 09-28-2012, 11:33 AM
Heebo Heebo is offline
Fire Giant

Heebo's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are a dick tater.
dicktater.net hasn't seen an update in days - deleting from favorites
__________________
  #78  
Old 09-28-2012, 11:34 AM
Heebo Heebo is offline
Fire Giant

Heebo's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 597
Default

dicktaters.net*
__________________
  #79  
Old 09-30-2012, 09:40 PM
runlvlzero runlvlzero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a motherfucking awesome place.
Posts: 2,801
Default

TMO plz drive more poeple to red so we can gank them more, thanks.
  #80  
Old 09-30-2012, 09:44 PM
BigSlip BigSlip is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 527
Default

amen
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.