Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 02-04-2012, 11:29 AM
Shiftin Shiftin is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am a TMO officer, but that is irrelevant in this discussion here. I was just talking about this with Diggle in IRC, actually. I don't speak for TMO, but this is my personal stance and I'm pretty sure I could get most of the guild behind me. Unless you guys aren't raiding together, it's one and the same to me whether it's IB or VD contesting our Trakanons. Y'all force us to camp in the lair for long and we might just stay there!
I love that you, as an officer, are threatening us with breaking the agreement your guild *demanded* 4 days ago, over what someone you demanded not be in the agreement will inevitably do as a result of you not letting them negotiate.

You're willing to go back to the miserable state things were in 3 months ago over 17% more free banked trakanon breastplates?

Honest question, did you not think VD would react unfavorably to you trying to boot them out of the rotation and acting like they're not a threat, or did you make this agreement as a stopgap knowing this would happen and planning to break it? I don't really see a third option, but I'm open to hearing one. Either you didn't think past your own noses about the consequences, or you don't actually intend to keep the peace.

TMO should know exactly how galvanizing it is to hear people call you a non-threat.
  #72  
Old 02-04-2012, 11:45 AM
Nizzarr Nizzarr is offline
Planar Protector

Nizzarr's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,644
Default

text me please when IBs vp dragons spawns. I dont wanna miss that
  #73  
Old 02-04-2012, 12:45 PM
Xanthias Xanthias is offline
Sarnak

Xanthias's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Most likely my bind point
Posts: 402
Default

Look at this from the TMO perspective a minute with the previous agreement... two guilds work together share loot on everything cept one dragon vs one guild... why should the two guilds be treated individually with one mob when they share all the rest?

Now I'm going to use logic here with a few Yes/No Questions

VD and IB work together and share loot on most raid encounters outside of VP - Yes

Can VD do these encounters on their own without assistance - Yes (see weekend when nothing was contested when VP opened)

Does VD consistently do these encounters solo when they are contested - No

It isn't a matter of TMO not thinking VD can do this stuff solo, hell we know you can, it is a matter that VD doesn't want to/desire to do it solo.

Trak solo with the spawn not being contested is COMPLETELY different than having to engage within a minute of it spawning. Anyone who says different is lying or trying to sell you something.

If VD wants to be a part of a rotation for Trak, they need to stand on their own with other raid encounters rather than fighting alongside IB.

Show you can do the fast engage and fight solo and earn your spot.

My 2cp.
__________________
60 Ranger and proud of it.
First Ranger Epic on P99
3rd place BotB
  #74  
Old 02-04-2012, 12:54 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanthias [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Look at this from the TMO perspective a minute with the previous agreement... two guilds work together share loot on everything cept one dragon vs one guild... why should the two guilds be treated individually with one mob when they share all the rest?

Now I'm going to use logic here with a few Yes/No Questions

VD and IB work together and share loot on most raid encounters outside of VP - Yes

Can VD do these encounters on their own without assistance - Yes (see weekend when nothing was contested when VP opened)

Does VD consistently do these encounters solo when they are contested - No

It isn't a matter of TMO not thinking VD can do this stuff solo, hell we know you can, it is a matter that VD doesn't want to/desire to do it solo.

Trak solo with the spawn not being contested is COMPLETELY different than having to engage within a minute of it spawning. Anyone who says different is lying or trying to sell you something.

If VD wants to be a part of a rotation for Trak, they need to stand on their own with other raid encounters rather than fighting alongside IB.

Show you can do the fast engage and fight solo and earn your spot.

My 2cp.
Your sensible post has no business being in RNF and IB will not understand it anyways.
However, any adult who doesn't spend their free time licking windows will probably understand our position now.
  #75  
Old 02-04-2012, 12:55 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're willing to go back to the miserable state things were in 3 months ago over 17% more free banked trakanon breastplates?
Short answer: Yes
  #76  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:11 PM
Shiftin Shiftin is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 755
Default

Why do you WANT to go back to having to engage a mob that spawns every 3 days within 1 minute? How many trak BPs do you need in your bank? Do you really not remember how awful camping there every 2 days and 6 hours was?

I just genuinely don't understand why youre setting the arbitrary bar at proving themselves using a horrible dynamic no one wants to exist as a benchmark. And then, your officers are saying if/when they do out mobilize you to your own traks, they will retaliate vs IB?

We do quite a few raids separately btw. Sky, epics, quite a few kunark dragons, Draco,
  #77  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:14 PM
YendorLootmonkey YendorLootmonkey is offline
Planar Protector

YendorLootmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surefall Glade
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanthias [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Look at this from the TMO perspective a minute with the previous agreement... two guilds work together share loot on everything cept one dragon vs one guild... why should the two guilds be treated individually with one mob when they share all the rest?

Now I'm going to use logic here with a few Yes/No Questions

VD and IB work together and share loot on most raid encounters outside of VP - Yes

Can VD do these encounters on their own without assistance - Yes (see weekend when nothing was contested when VP opened)

Does VD consistently do these encounters solo when they are contested - No

It isn't a matter of TMO not thinking VD can do this stuff solo, hell we know you can, it is a matter that VD doesn't want to/desire to do it solo.

Trak solo with the spawn not being contested is COMPLETELY different than having to engage within a minute of it spawning. Anyone who says different is lying or trying to sell you something.

If VD wants to be a part of a rotation for Trak, they need to stand on their own with other raid encounters rather than fighting alongside IB.

Show you can do the fast engage and fight solo and earn your spot.

My 2cp.
So, pray tell Xanthais, why does TMO get to dictate what the standards are for earning a spot in the rotation?

Wanna split back into TMO and DA and all four guilds can rotate? Or is the fear that neither TMO and DA can take down Trak on their own? Now to me, THAT would be an interesting rotation.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:

"You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles
  #78  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:17 PM
Shiftin Shiftin is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Short answer: Yes
Then I don't think we have anything further to discuss, as this qualifies you as a crazy person.

See you in VP next time zealot wants our whole guild to con yellow again.
  #79  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:32 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

So one of the "big guilds" is investing 10 times as many hours into the game, for much less than 10 times the amount of loot? Sounds like another ordinary day on project 1999.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #80  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:37 PM
Xanthias Xanthias is offline
Sarnak

Xanthias's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Most likely my bind point
Posts: 402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So, pray tell Xanthais, why does TMO get to dictate what the standards are for earning a spot in the rotation?

Wanna split back into TMO and DA and all four guilds can rotate? Or is the fear that neither TMO and DA can take down Trak on their own? Now to me, THAT would be an interesting rotation.
Two points:
1) During negotiations people make their demands/desires known and all parties come to some sort of compromise.

2) Are you saying that VD and IB are actually one guild?
Because last I checked DA and TMO weren't two separate guilds raiding together, but all under one tag after they merged...
__________________
60 Ranger and proud of it.
First Ranger Epic on P99
3rd place BotB
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.