Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Melee

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-25-2023, 07:21 PM
PatChapp PatChapp is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,164
Default

Ranger can also just get an oggok bind and invis back, not sure why bind point could be an issue
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2023, 11:21 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,528
Default

You certainly can solo a ranger in there. It's not "easy" so I'm not sure the ZEM is paying off unless you're really tricky with harmony and sticking to some of the easier spots like the sewer.

Nothing in HK heals or harmtouches. Yea I'm a basic when it comes to moving the yellow bar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2023, 11:51 AM
Imago Imago is offline
Fire Giant

Imago's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 829
Default

Ranger tanking is only noticeably inferior to warrior tanking at the highest levels of kunark/velious content. And maybe PoSky.

I’ve tanked Faydedar on a ranger no problem. He’s not a top notch dragon, but there’s really only a handful of mobs outside of ToV that need a sturdier tank.

Get that hammer, and get a Tolan BP. Having self portability options is fantastic
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael View Post
You're just a british meatball.
Red99: 60 Ranger / 60 Rogue / 60 Monk / 60 Necro / 55 Wiz / 55 Paladin / 55 Bard / 53 Druid
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2023, 01:09 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,070
Default

i never had an issue ranger tanking, of course with gear, from 1-60. it really wasnt hard or bad.

with gear ive tanked all of VP/hot, etc. can others do better? sure but its not like rangers cant, they can get pretty decent HP and VP dies in a disc timer.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2023, 02:52 PM
Jimjam Jimjam is online now
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imago [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ranger tanking is only noticeably inferior to warrior tanking at the highest levels of kunark/velious content. And maybe PoSky.

I’ve tanked Faydedar on a ranger no problem. He’s not a top notch dragon, but there’s really only a handful of mobs outside of ToV that need a sturdier tank.

Get that hammer, and get a Tolan BP. Having self portability options is fantastic
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i never had an issue ranger tanking, of course with gear, from 1-60. it really wasnt hard or bad.

with gear ive tanked all of VP/hot, etc. can others do better? sure but its not like rangers cant, they can get pretty decent HP and VP dies in a disc timer.
Did you guys level your rangers before / after the AC revamp? After the defence skill cap changed to 220?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-26-2023, 03:06 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Did you guys level your rangers before / after the AC revamp? After the defence skill cap changed to 220?
Before I leveled in 2016 for ranger
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2023, 12:14 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,528
Default

It’s not so much AC as the hp pool of the average ranger. Mine usually runs MR gear for the fantasy I might pull something. Without BiS that usually means a mid/low 2k hp ranger. Where a tank can more confidently stack hp > all gear (AC usually comes with it). I’ve tanked slowed cliff golems with my ranger and get beat up pretty bad. The pally it’s rather boring. Whether due to the AC, defense skills, or almost double the self buffed HP. Technically either works though so it just depends on perspective and how much mana efficiency matters.

With a quick slow anyone can tank anything. Hell, Bard regen is enough to keep up with almost any blue con and the right group composition. Objectively though, rangers are more squishy then knights. Knights a bit more than monks (it’s close but monks prob have the edge, but average with higher hps). Warriors are the best outside aggro.

Slow early. Make sure nobody runs out of red bar. Win the game.
Last edited by Snaggles; 09-27-2023 at 12:17 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2023, 12:18 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,528
Default

As for that last post, doesn’t really matter in CT. I know some rangers with a woodsman and fungi who leveled there with ease. They probably know the zone really well and were selective.

In general, HP recovery of a ranger or even SK even with a fungi is low. That’s the issue here. Compared to a monk or especially a pally 45+ and you can face tank for days.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2023, 02:52 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

I haven’t had time to play this week. I did go to CT but I admittedly don’t know the zone well. It might be one of the only zones in the game I could get lost in (and quite easily). The heals through the walls were just awful but when I could isolate mobs away from heals it wasn’t that bad. I did get a few levels there.

Maybe it would have been easier sober? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By the end of the session I had imbibed enough that I can’t immediately recall what level I was when I logged out. 43 or 44 I think?

All in all I rate the zone as overly complicated and buggy as hell … but I did it (well some of it).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2023, 04:34 PM
wittles wittles is offline
Orc


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I haven’t had time to play this week. I did go to CT but I admittedly don’t know the zone well. It might be one of the only zones in the game I could get lost in (and quite easily). The heals through the walls were just awful but when I could isolate mobs away from heals it wasn’t that bad. I did get a few levels there.

Maybe it would have been easier sober? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By the end of the session I had imbibed enough that I can’t immediately recall what level I was when I logged out. 43 or 44 I think?

All in all I rate the zone as overly complicated and buggy as hell … but I did it (well some of it).
What level did you start to hunt there?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.