Fusion Energy

[Nibblewitz]

Certainly, increasing carbon dioxide in a closed system will increase warming, but there are so many nuances and misconceptions about the problem and solutions. No one acknowledges that radiative forcing due to CO2 is logarithmic with concentration. Our weather models are terrible after 7 days but they peddle these 100 year forecasts with 1000 percent error bars. Atmospheric physicists (not junk science climate activists) are still discovering climate cycles and processes of varying time scales and magnitudes. Meanwhile, society is reaping the benefits of increased CO2 through crop productivity and drought-resistant plants.

The debate about the solution is even more troubling. Batteries are simply receptacles of the “dirty” energy from the grid, while requiring more fossil fuels to mine the metals required. Ever seen solar and wind powered mining equipment? The solar and wind farms requiring more mining and more land and more deforestation. Anyone advocating for a carbon neutral world should just stop exhaling CO2 now to spare themselves from a world without electricity and running water.

[Botten]

To ED and the Nibble…

Not even bothering since you are offering opinions without backed research.

Debating with made up statistics verse many educated specialist.

Your lifetime brainwashed ideals from kinfolk, religion and opinion entertainment are dribble.

Oh and ED to Godwin an argument is just amateur hour.

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To ED and the Nibble…

Not even bothering since you are offering opinions without backed research.

Debating with made up statistics verse many educated specialist.

Your lifetime brainwashed ideals from kinfolk, religion and opinion entertainment are dribble.

Oh and ED to Godwin an argument is just amateur hour.

$20 Billion Dollars LMAO

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Encroaching Death [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

$20 Billion Dollars LMAO

Not my fault you make an ass of yourself when you make assumptions from a quote in a government article.

Flail more.

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not my fault you make an ass of yourself when you make assumptions from a quote in a government article.

Flail more.

$20 billion dollars....

Hahahahahabababahahahahahahahdjfjfn

[magnetaress]

i thought fusiion energy meant i would never have to be cold or hot again in my life time

[Botten]

https://www.energylivenews.com/2022/...n-this-winter/

[Ooloo]

Nuclear energy is insanely cleaner than any other proposed energy source, and by far provides more kwh per human death associated with it's production, for a fraction of the land footprint of both fossil fuels and hippy windmills.

Still no good argument from dems like AOC against nuclear. They either pretend it doesn't exist, or pretend nuclear = scary atomic bombs cause they are 7th graders in politician's clothing.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nuclear energy is insanely cleaner than any other proposed energy source, and by far provides more kwh per human death associated with it's production, for a fraction of the land footprint of both fossil fuels and hippy windmills.

Still no good argument from dems like AOC against nuclear. They either pretend it doesn't exist, or pretend nuclear = scary atomic bombs cause they are 7th graders in politician's clothing.

Man you keep pumping out the examples of how ignorant you really are.

Around 12.1 trillion yen ($82 billion) has already been spent to deal with the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, according to sources at the Board of Audit of Japan.

The utility now aims to start that work in the second half of fiscal 2023. It is still on going....

Scientifically speaking contamination with radioactive caesium, with a half-life of up to around 30 years, remains in the environment for a long time.

And lets talk about Chernobyl

Experts have said it will be at least 3,000 years for the area to become safe, while others believe this is too optimistic. It is thought that the reactor site will not become habitable again for at least 20,000 years, according to a 2016 report.

roughly US $68 billion in 2019, adjusted for inflation.


How about the worse body of water most contaminated with radioactive pollution: Lake Karachay (aka "Reservoir 9"), a small lake formerly located near the Mayak Production Association, a nuclear facility in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia.

standing near the shore you'd be exposed to a dose of 5.6 Sievert per hour. That's enough radiation to kill you in about 50 minutes.


But sure have a cow about ... what did you call them.. hippy wind mills. What if we coupled it with solar energy... still too hippy for you?

Wind and solar produce more electricity than nuclear for the first time in the US and much safer

Keep sticking that foot in your mouth Baler.

Got to love your Ben Shapiro on the spot made up statistics and opinions!!!

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Man you keep pumping out the examples of how ignorant you really are.

Around 12.1 trillion yen ($82 billion) has already been spent to deal with the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, according to sources at the Board of Audit of Japan.

The utility now aims to start that work in the second half of fiscal 2023. It is still on going....

Scientifically speaking contamination with radioactive caesium, with a half-life of up to around 30 years, remains in the environment for a long time.

And lets talk about Chernobyl

Experts have said it will be at least 3,000 years for the area to become safe, while others believe this is too optimistic. It is thought that the reactor site will not become habitable again for at least 20,000 years, according to a 2016 report.

roughly US $68 billion in 2019, adjusted for inflation.


How about the worse body of water most contaminated with radioactive pollution: Lake Karachay (aka "Reservoir 9"), a small lake formerly located near the Mayak Production Association, a nuclear facility in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia.

standing near the shore you'd be exposed to a dose of 5.6 Sievert per hour. That's enough radiation to kill you in about 50 minutes.


But sure have a cow about ... what did you call them.. hippy wind mills. What if we coupled it with solar energy... still too hippy for you?

Wind and solar produce more electricity than nuclear for the first time in the US and much safer

Keep sticking that foot in your mouth Baler.

Got to love your Ben Shapiro on the spot made up statistics and opinions!!!

I forget if it's kwh/cost or mhw/cost for the words but do those for the nuke-u-lar and the wind and the solar.

Deuterium can be mined from the sea.