Joke 6 Committee "Hearing"

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If your stance is that most of the people in the OT forum on P99 are a good gauge for what the majority of American citizens are like you might need to seriously re-evaluate your analysis.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jibartik]

Why would I believe you about anything if you literally are trying to tell me to my face that I said something that I didn't, nor dont believe.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"I honestly dont think a single forum poster here has changed their stance on any of the candidates? I know I did."

Did you mean to say that you didn't*?

Ok that's fair what I meant was that I went from hating the guy to being indifferent.

I just want to be clear about that. I inferred you said that I changed to support him, which was my bad.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok that's fair what I meant was that I went from hating the guy to being indifferent.

I just want to be clear about that. I inferred you said that I changed to support him, which was my bad.

Understood

[Jibartik]

Anyway, what are we talking about? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyway, what are we talking about? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cheese

[Jibartik]

Oh yea this trial is a witch hunt and I dont support any of it!

[Reiwa]

I forget why I'm supposed to dislike this person.

Several points deserve underscoring. For starters, a “referral” from the committee would have no legal significance.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Several points deserve underscoring. For starters, a “referral” from the committee would have no legal significance.[/URL]

Not sure what you point is? If by legal significance you mean legally able to compel the DOJ to do something then yeah no shit, that's how the system works. Thanks for stating the obvious.

What's significant about a committee referring something to DOJ for criminal investigation is that this usually happens where there's some likelihood that a crime was committed by one or more persons involved. So yeah, it would be a pretty big deal if that referral happened (especially considering the subject matter involved; i.e. a President trying to stop the certification of a legitimate and legal election to keep himself in power...if there is a referral to the DOJ about that it's an absolutely massive event in US history).

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what you point is? If by legal significance you mean legally able to compel the DOJ to do something then yeah no shit, that's how the system works. Thanks for stating the obvious.

What's significant about a committee referring something to DOJ for criminal investigation is that this usually happens where there's some likelihood that a crime was committed by one or more persons involved. So yeah, it would be a pretty big deal if that referral happened (especially considering the subject matter involved; i.e. a President trying to stop the certification of a legitimate and legal election to keep himself in power...if there is a referral to the DOJ about that it's an absolutely massive event in US history).

I'm trying to find non-contempt referrals to find out the weight of it happening if it happens.

Also lol Neil Gorsuch's mama almost got done up for contempt