Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2020, 02:22 PM
Toomuch Toomuch is offline
Kobold

Toomuch's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fammaden [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As far as petitionquest, how about we have a limit to how many times per week or per month a guild can even file a raid petition? Like in the NFL where the coach only has so many red challenge flags per game. That way people aren't petitioning every tiny little slight and technicality in hopes the GM's rule in their favor, you have to use your petitions wisely.
Nope, that'd be bad, that leaves the door wide open to serious shenanigans.

Example:
Part 1: It quakes. There's a blatant train on raid force A by raid force B during a Dozekar engage. Raid force A wipes, and raid force B kills Dozekar. Fraps are taken, and it's a very clear raid violation. It gets petitioned by raid force A, because that's what you'd do. (at this point your only petition is used up)
Part 2: 30 minutes later, There's a blatant train on raid force A by raid force B (again), this time during an Aaryonar engage, raid force A wipes, and raid force B kills Aaryonar. Fraps are taken, and it's a very clear raid violation. (Raid force A is out of petitions)
Part 3: 2 hours later, There's a blatant train on raid force A by raid force B (again), this time during a Vulak engage, raid force A wipes, and raid force B kills Vulak. Fraps are taken, and it's a very clear raid violation. (Raid force A is out of petitions)

Or say it's 3 days after a quake, and all ST golems are in window, and same thing one raid force trains the other one on 3 separate encounters. Or say it's 3 weeks after a quake and the ST windows are now spread out over the course of 48 hours, and one raid force trains the other raid force for all 3 ST golems.

I hope you're getting the idea: You need to be able to petition extremely bad behavior, whenever it happens, and the punishment(s) should fit the crime(s). Allowing for only 1 petition to be submitted basically opens the door for future bad behavior. It'd become a game of "ok we're going to get 1 bad thing out of the way, so they petition it, and then we're home free, we can do whatever the hell we want until the hammer comes down on that 1st thing we did, and the rest will be un-reportable. So let's make sure to train them on all low to mid-level targets, hope they submit that petition, and if they didn't, well, free mobs! And if we're able to confirm they already submitted a petition, train them after that too, and more free mobs!"

In short: What needs to STOP is 1. the bad behavior (not the reporting of bad behavior), and 2. the reporting of non-issues, "grasping at straws" kinds of issues, issues where it's truly not the player's or raid force's fault that something happened, and "crying wolf" types of issues.
__________________
P1999 Blue: Relent Less - 60 Bard ; Red: Shifty - 24 Druid
Formerly: Toomuch Twohandle 65 Ranger on Sullon Zek
Last edited by Toomuch; 10-21-2020 at 02:29 PM.. Reason: left out some details on what needs to stop.
  #2  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:20 PM
HitsmeChanter HitsmeChanter is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 13
Default

I think this would turn the current 20 page petitions the GMs have to read into 100 page petitions because guilds would try to bundle them...
  #3  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:30 PM
Fammaden Fammaden is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,464
Default

Then throw out the whole thing if you get to a second incident in the same petition.
  #4  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:46 PM
HitsmeChanter HitsmeChanter is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 13
Default

The real problem is that we're encountering a lot of problems around racing, training, leapfrogging etc... those ALL stem from rooted dragons...
  #5  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:50 PM
HitsmeChanter HitsmeChanter is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 13
Default

Another option is FTE race with a 1 hour lockout 3 weeks of every month. Every 4th cycle the big guilds, Freedom, AG, Riot don't participate for a full 24 hours post first pop, that allows casuals time to band together and go after any target(s) they want.
  #6  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:50 PM
Fammaden Fammaden is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,464
Default

Well Galach has made it clear that ToV specifically is only one part of a ten point list of problems and bringing up rooting/unrooting to him is pointless.
  #7  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:51 PM
galach galach is offline
Server GM

galach's Avatar

Join Date: May 2019
Location: Right behind you invisible
Posts: 7,066
Default

Not dev/management. I can't unroot.
  #8  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:56 PM
Zipity Zipity is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 787
Default

FTE lockouts literally solves every single issue in one fell swoop and we already have yellow text in place. I say we try it for a month.
  #9  
Old 10-21-2020, 01:59 PM
Fammaden Fammaden is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zipity [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FTE lockouts literally solves every single issue in one fell swoop and we already have yellow text in place. I say we try it for a month.
It doesn't solve petition quest and likely makes it worse without server side notifications of when a guild is locked/unlocked.
  #10  
Old 10-21-2020, 02:04 PM
HitsmeChanter HitsmeChanter is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 13
Default

The problem is no matter what someones going to be irate about the solution. Could we consider other options than just a straight rotation. I feel like that will just lead to an extremely long line of guilds all trying to get their piece of the pie... just off the top of my head...

- could we reduce spawn times?
- enact nuclear level penalties for abusing petitions?
- enact nuclear level penalties for repeat rule violations?
- expand the guide team to lower the workload?
- create a player counsel to debate, discuss and decide on the outcome of petitions? (with GM oversight to avoid abuse, or even to prelim a decision and pass to GMS to give a thumbs up or down)
- Pick the core mobs that cause the most contention and rotate those, aka, city leaders, vulak, CT?


I think that this problem is too complex for a simple solution like, just rotate all.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.