Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2019, 01:02 PM
Bardp1999 Bardp1999 is offline
Planar Protector

Bardp1999's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Maceland
Posts: 1,441
Default

I think Teal will flop and everyone will stay on Green, but thats just me.

If you don't like the new server don't transfer
__________________
Forum Quest
Spyder73 (BANNED)
NecroP1999 (BANNED)

#LobsterClan
#FreeWuTang
  #2  
Old 11-03-2019, 01:08 PM
silo32 silo32 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,206
Default

they should shut down the forums, leave green alone and let god sort it out with /petition
  #3  
Old 11-03-2019, 01:53 PM
zaneosak zaneosak is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 995
Default

I'd love to go "off the beaten" path. Me and my duo buddy were trying this all morning, ran around all over the world to find mobs to XP off of and had a really rough time. Must be our level range. Najena was either greens or reds. South Karana was either greens or reds , the occasional blue was once every 3-4 minutes of running in the vast area, so much landscape, so few mobs. Oasis was 70+ people and only deepwater crocs were blue, but then again, they are pretty much all camped by croc groups. If someone told us a place to go, we'd go, we just might be in a deadzone level but eastern karana seems like the only place to go and its jam packed as well. (Druid/Bard)

We'd join a full group somewhere for sure but its a little hard to build a group in Guk or Unrest with every camp already taken. We're a little too low for permafrost, too low for cazic thule. Any tips appreciated [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #4  
Old 11-03-2019, 02:19 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,560
Default

Imagine arguing in favor of splitting a server that you admitted you don't even play on
  #5  
Old 11-03-2019, 03:18 PM
supermonk supermonk is offline
Fire Giant

supermonk's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 576
Default

what were normal classic pops like back in 99? never played then.
__________________

the Salt King <Ironborn>
  #6  
Old 11-03-2019, 03:56 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supermonk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
what were normal classic pops like back in 99? never played then.
Generally between 2-2.3k on average after the first month or so
  #7  
Old 11-03-2019, 04:09 PM
supermonk supermonk is offline
Fire Giant

supermonk's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Generally between 2-2.3k on average after the first month or so
then why need two servers!?
__________________

the Salt King <Ironborn>
  #8  
Old 11-03-2019, 04:51 PM
zaneosak zaneosak is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 995
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supermonk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
then why need two servers!?
Because people didn't know what high ZEM was. Druids didn't solo with charm. Bards didnt swarm kite. People didn't know that faster XP was possible. People grouped up, killed mobs, XP is what it was.

Now people know the best zones, know the best xp, would rather sit afk with LFG for the best XP or even fight over 1 single spawn in a "good zone" than grind slow XP in a sub-optimal zone.
  #9  
Old 11-03-2019, 05:13 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaneosak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because people didn't know what high ZEM was. Druids didn't solo with charm. Bards didnt swarm kite. People didn't know that faster XP was possible. People grouped up, killed mobs, XP is what it was.

Now people know the best zones, know the best xp, would rather sit afk with LFG for the best XP or even fight over 1 single spawn in a "good zone" than grind slow XP in a sub-optimal zone.
We essentially have people who claim to like EQ, but really are more suited for WoW in terms of their need for maximum EXP at all times and needing to be able to do whatever they want whenever they want
  #10  
Old 11-04-2019, 09:53 AM
Yorkshire Yorkshire is offline
Orc


Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Leander, TX
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaneosak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because people didn't know what high ZEM was. Druids didn't solo with charm. Bards didnt swarm kite. People didn't know that faster XP was possible. People grouped up, killed mobs, XP is what it was.

Now people know the best zones, know the best xp, would rather sit afk with LFG for the best XP or even fight over 1 single spawn in a "good zone" than grind slow XP in a sub-optimal zone.
I agree with this. I haven't played in nearly 14 years and am blown away how some people are already in the 30s and 40s after a week of play!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.