America Vs China

[Spud]

What if China has mini-ditka on their team?

[naez]

yea bros we create mini black holes by shooting particles at each other. i think we're gonna do a bit better than 1940s before silicon wafers

[naez]

well you see the Hiroshima bombs were hydrogen. nowadays we learned how to enrich uranium and plutonium and shit. now i aint no rocket scientist but I think more neutrons = better dirty bomb for fucking the environment up

[Beastro]

Originally Posted by naez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

well you see the Hiroshima bombs were hydrogen. nowadays we learned how to enrich uranium and plutonium and shit. now i aint no rocket scientist but I think more neutrons = better dirty bomb for fucking the environment up

Still fails in light of the face that all warheads bound to land on cities are air bursts and thus produce a minimum of fallout.

The only targets set for ground bursts would be underground military targets such as ICBM silos which are set well outside of population centers.

As for neutron bombs, if you're thinking of them, they were only built by the US with on thing in mind: to irradiate the Soviet tank waves which would flood into Western Germany.

Even then it was a faulty theory to work on and they didn't come to much.

[Beastro]

Originally Posted by naez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

well you see the Hiroshima bombs were hydrogen.

And fuck again this lack of editing.

Little Boy was enriched Uranium, Fat Man was Plutonium.

No doubt you just said the BS above to troll as you always do Naez.

[naez]

So they were. From what I can tell hydrogen bombs may be even better than uranium weapons because of the type of reaction. But like I said it doesn't take a brain surgeon to be a rocket scientist.

[bman8810]

I considered responding to naez and then I realized that responding to the trolls just means the trolls win. Seriously though, you don't have to have a degree in physics, chemistry, nuclear engineering, or chemical engineering to understand the difference between a hydrogen bomb and an atomic bomb.

[Beastro]

Originally Posted by bman8810 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I considered responding to naez and then I realized that responding to the trolls just means the trolls win. Seriously though, you don't have to have a degree in physics, chemistry, nuclear engineering, or chemical engineering to understand the difference between a hydrogen bomb and an atomic bomb.

But that's the fun with Naez, just treat him straight up answering his deliberate errors and undermines his shtick.

Anti-Troll 101: Act completely clam and level headed.

[naez]

you dont need a degree in anything to be an expert on the internet

[bman8810]

An expert on the internet can easily discern the type of bomb dropped on Hiroshima or the difference and relative power of hydrogen bombs and bombs using uranium.

Does that mean you just fail completely?