Russians Behind DNC attack!

[Raev]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Raev: 97% of the world scientists agree on human made global warming. 97% of people way smarter than you and me. Now i'm sure you think you're smarter than that, but let me tell you: you're not.

Speak for yourself; I have a PhD from a top 5 institution worldwide in my field.

Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Speak for yourself; I have a PhD from a top 5 institution worldwide in my field.

Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

You got the balls to share which field? Feels like a social science to me.

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Speak for yourself; I have a PhD from a top 5 institution worldwide in my field.

Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

Yeah well i'm the poker world champion 7 years in a row, so my opinion on global warming is totally relevant

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also Lune, I don't understand why you seem totally unable to grasp the simple concept that one cannot determine causal relationships by pure observation, as one can never rule out a hidden joint cause, but your mind seems only capable of generating a stream of irrelevant straw men and insults. Your coworkers must find you delightful.

If there's a simple concept to grasp, it's that you can accumulate strong evidence for causation with a combination of observational and experimental data.

For example, we accumulated enough evidence about the accumulation of lead in the environment to stop putting it on our fuel. If they had listened to people like you, we'd still be spewing lead everywhere because we were never able to actually experimentally verify that lead was actually navigating the complex pathway from gasoline additive to retarded children because there was no parallel universe to act as a control.

I do not insult unless insulted first or it's someone I do not respect. Given that your first words in this thread were disparaging my intelligence, it's a little hypocritical to whine about it.

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyway, I think I'm done with this thread. It's pretty boring to read 50 million appeals to authority.

I didn't appeal to authority until my third post, and only because you attacked the integrity and sincerity of that authority to try and weaken a scientific opinion. You can't assault an authority and then whine when I defend it. Everything you're accusing others of in this thread, you did in your very first post.

[Pokesan]

raev already declared himself the victor sorry you lost

[AzzarTheGod]

Man Raev hit a lot of PHD dunks in this thread.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Raev: 97% of the world scientists agree on human made global warming. 97% of people way smarter than you and me. Now i'm sure you think you're smarter than that, but let me tell you: you're not.

People still spout this myth? hahahaha!
What do I care about 79 selected "scientists" churning out a 97% consensus in accordance with their bring home the bacon peer-review papers?
What parallel universe do you come from where there are only 79 scientists in the "world"?

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If they had listened to people like you, we'd still be spewing lead everywhere because we were never able to actually experimentally verify that lead was actually navigating the complex pathway from gasoline additive to retarded children because there was no parallel universe to act as a control.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People still spout this myth? hahahaha!
What do I care about 79 selected "scientists" churning out a 97% consensus in accordance with their meat and potatoes peer-review papers?
What parallel universe do you come from where there are only 79 scientists in the "world"?

This is an important point and deserves quoting ^^

[AzzarTheGod]

Yeah but spewing mercury everywhere is safe apparently.

I have to sustain Raev's science on the basis that mercury is ok in 2016 but lead is not.

Poison tree theory, if 1 part of an argument doesn't jive then all of it must be thrown out.