Trump gets the shaft - Cruz proven communist

[iruinedyourday]

0cd much?

[AzzarTheGod]

r u?

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

0cd much?

Only when I exceed 50 awpm or flip on my guitar amp.
I will try to use small-er words for you in the fu-ture.

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't see how you can compare them that way. 0bama was a nobody 1 term senator before running for president ... and a good deal of that time was preparing for his run for presented. He was absolutely nobody, nobody at all, as far as the public eye. He was a lecturer at Chicago law school.

I don't see it the same, Donald is well known for decades, good and bad. Compare him to Bill Gates, where you think Bill Gates falls on the issues? Gates is psycho left, like world control crap. He's a globalist, pushing population control issues, big government, global warming (all related). The guy is about as nuts as Al Gore, he just doesn't profile himself publicly like that but all his actions and talking points are there. but mentioning them as billionaires, in the public eye, politically active be it directly or indirectly, as a comparison point.

Now Ted. Again, short time in the senate. He showed more activity than 0bama as a senator, but still didn't get much done, not much support, and didn't really put much time into leadership roles. Before this he was an unknown too, but not entirely as he was a good lawyer (if there is such a thing). The man can out study and out think others, but still not a point of real leadership, not on any large scale.

Now while Donald hasn't held any seat (not that the others really did for long), he has been somewhat vocal about politics in the public eye, long before Ted or 0bama were around. Meanwhile he did business on a large scale, dealing with all the intricacies with business in a leadership position. Also interacting with politicians and organizations. He's a wheel greaser, he's done things as much if not more than the other have. He's also free from banks and Bush's, makes it all the better. The guy has credibility, having done the job, coming under budget and before the dead-line.

So back to the wrap-up, I don't see how he is comparable to 0bama, he had virtually no record of anything, while Donald does. 0bama never even had any real-world experience, spent his life in school, ran for the senate to springboard to president, played golf. Oh, and screwed up the country worse than friggen Carter. If anything, 0bama and Ted are more alike.

Donald whines more then a school girl on the rag, much like Obama.

[stressl]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hillary is over there on the far right, isn't she?

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by stressl [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hillary is over there on the far right, isn't she?

don't bother trying to make sense of it, it's bernie bro garbage

[maskedmelon]

It doesn't matter where they are, they serve the same master. They are each a part of the great barbed phallus of authority aimed squarely at the public anus of our purpose-starved society.

[Nibblewitz]

Fractured party is fractured. Shit platform is also shit.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Donald whines more then a school girl on the rag, much like Obama.

"But here's the thing: Democratic legitimacy is not just about following the rules as written. It's about having a set of rules designed to produce a result in line with voter preferences. In some states, the Republican nominating rules are designed to ignore the will of the voters.

Trump is right: These states' rules are a scam, and saying so is not whining."
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump...s-right-2016-4

And then it goes on to read:

"Take Colorado, for example. Voters in Colorado didn't get to vote in a primary or a caucus because the state's Republican Party executive committee decided last summer not to hold any presidential preference vote. Instead, voters had to gather at far-flung, time-consuming conventions to choose individual delegates.

Why wasn't there a caucus with a presidential vote as Colorado had held in previous years? Because this time the RNC had ordered states to bind their delegates to actually vote in line with voters' presidential preference. Colorado Republicans didn't want to do that, so they got rid of the presidential vote."


And you say they voted for delegates [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] but really only the activists with no life or took vacation time to go to the convention to vote etc. And that's just in that state, Pennsylvania just got a list of delegate names, and no idea of their position, they could have been Hillary supporters for all they knew. And there are other states struggling within this con game too.

And Cruz supports this garbage, he has no real character. He should leave politics and go back to arguing lawyer stuff, of which for most lawyers is just a job. Cruz has shown himself just part of the problem the reps have been having, and the nation. This is the kind of stuff Cruz is suppose to be fighting against, and just shows what kind of person he is by not doing so. I think I'd even vote for Kasich before Cruz, but here I'll say it at this point that I won't vote for either of them. They are both scumbags.

That's a good article, well worth a read for those that are into that stuff.

[Daywolf]

4 time Colorado delegate speaks out about the cheating. Left Rep party, no longer a stooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]