![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
This thread is getting too rnf'ish. Lets salvage it and sift out the real substantive conversation that fifield, dald, and some others are trying to proceed with.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Perhaps fifield should start with trying to change his own guild's attitude towards the situation before trying to get other guilds on board.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
I feel as if you can have an agreement wherein guilds that fight as alliances always fight as alliances and so forth. Just takes some give and take by the leadership of the various guilds involved in such an arrangement.
__________________
Juevento - 60 Rogue <BDA>
Juevento - Druid <Free Agent> | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
So much bad information in this thread. Most of you need to stop regurgitating fabricated opinions you exchange with each other in late night vent convos. Asgard would sign off on fifield's proposal, 2 mages to cover a wing of 15 targets is reasonable. Awakened's stance of 2 mages per target in a wing of 15 dragons is not reasonable. FA has told awakened for weeks that we would sit down with them and map out new rules, awakened hasn't accepted the invitation and instead started a magician arms race. It doesn't matter who you are or where your information comes from, the above statements are first hand from the top facts and everything else is just people running their mouths. Invitation to work out new rules is still available whenever awakened wants to come to the table.
__________________
Pint
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
The reason I don't like Fifield's proposal is mages are dumb and CotH racing is dumb. Foot racing would be more fun. Let's get rid of mages and agree to foot race rules instead. But a genuine question. Let's say, you beat me to FTE on Cekenar because we have a Vulak and Dagarn mage. We saw you had a Vulak Mage but last we heard you had a Koi Mage and our Vulak FTE CotH'd rogue never saw you run in from Koi. What level of evidence would you require us to present you to prove you exceeded the 2 Mage limit in north warranting a concede of the target? I ask this because the 2 Mage in north thing is impossible to police amongst ourselves. The only reason we realized you were gating mages to spawns and then CotHing is because you already had 2 Vulak mages in view, just like we did. At that point we had no one else in North, so we had no eyes on the other Mage spots and the only reason we could prove you gated a Mage is because an officer told us you did, and we saw no one CotH'd to Vulak. You can't police 2 mages per wing in North because you'd need eyes at 3 different mages to prove they're all there and you're breaking the agreement. Or... Just require anyone getting FTE be camped at entrance (VP pad) behind the door. Only allow 2 ranger trackers in North. And profit.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's called being a realist. No good, no bad, just each guild doing what it should be doing - what it's members desire. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
I don't see how desiring not having a coh race is crazy. A rotation would be a lot less stress for each guild.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|