Quote:
Originally Posted by Luminari
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because it shows that no amount of time will cause one type of creature will turn into another. It's NEVER been seen to occur. It CANNOT be reproduced via any experiment. Those two facts combined with the fact that even 500 million years is not sufficient time to induce a change completely disproves the idea of evolution from one kind to another.
|
It certainly shows those specific creatures have not significantly changed over an extended period of time. Living fossil, btw, simply means a creature's closest relatives are extinct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luminari
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No. The idea that single celled organisms turned into animals and other advanced life forms. The idea that sea dwelling creatures became land dwelling creatures and vice versa. Fish will always be fish. Whales will always be whales. If it's a sea dwelling creature it will always be one. If it's a land dwelling creature it will always be one. If it's an amphibian it will always be one. No evidence exists whatsoever that demonstrates anything I just said to be false. Science REQUIRES observation and experimentation. These aren't fucking optional like so many dumb fucks apparently think.
|
So you're saying variation can occur within one type of animal? But with provision that should a population of one type of animal be some how separated those two populations would never accumulate sufficient variation to be incompatible if they were to reunite?