![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#73
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yes, there will always be a group of players who win the race. That's the nature of contested content. But the situation you describe is still orders of magnitude more classic than the current environment. Really, the server needs to wipe every 2 years. This one, or new one for that purpose, I don't care. The inflation oriented nature of these games makes wiping the server the only want you can create any semblance of balance and consistency. | |||
|
Last edited by Basenji; 03-11-2015 at 09:18 AM..
Reason: Quoted post I was responding to.
|
|
|||
|
#74
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#75
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#76
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#78
|
||||
|
Quote:
Class C currently has an ultimatum to "work out minor problems." A good portion of these are indeed worked out internally, but only because the "reward" for petitioning is minor in comparison. As the damage to your competition increases, the incentive to petition, no matter the cause, rises as well. Currently, a petition risks annoying the GMs. It's often not worth it for minor offenses because it'll maybe result in a mob or two. However, when your competition would be banned for several weeks at a time, it becomes extremely worth it to manufacture and fabricate offenses. It's been done before, and it will most certainly be incentivized under the proposed system unless there are serious changes in the petition process.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6 | |||
|
|
||||
|
#79
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#80
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|