![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How close should players have to be to the spore king? | |||
| On his spawn point or just behind the castle |
|
79 | 42.93% |
| Zone out/brain rooms |
|
23 | 12.50% |
| Tube/wherever the fuck you can pull him to |
|
82 | 44.57% |
| Voters: 184. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
The answer to this is, no they should not. If they aren't clearing it, they have no room to complain if you do that.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Gunnter - 60 Assassin Syzzurp Purpledrank - 60 Grandmaster Scientology Tomcruise -60 Phantasmist < The Mystical Order > | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
An actual King 'group' of 6 people would kill everything in the jail, brain room, and pull shrooms. What does it matter if 3 people claim the camp and don't feel like killing the other mobs they're entitled to? It's their right to choose which mobs they kill and which they don't for whatever reason. Just because they aren't touching them doesn't mean that someone else is should be entitled to them.
What are you actually upset about here? If a full group of 6 people claiming king were only killing the king, would that be a problem? What if they camped out in the zone out room and only killed those 3 mobs + king. Would you care if they were killing all the mobs, yet still pulled to the tube room? What if it were 5 people? 4? Where do you draw the line over what is an acceptable amount players that can enjoy the same content for whatever purpose and which mobs you require them kill? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
If they are not being engaged or they have no intent in killing them, they are by definition uncamped. If they want people to not screw with their mobs, they are free to relocate, or kill them. Just because you can solo pull a mob to a safe room doesn't mean you can lay claim to every mob inbetween you and your target if you are not killing them. So could I kill the jail frogs and tell someone they aren't allowed to kill fungi king, even if I don't plan on killing it or any Myconids. No. Because that is abso-fucking-lutely retarded.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
-Core-Riot-
-The Untz Factory- -Awakened- -Taken-Taken II- "I may not agree with what you say, but to your death I will defend your right to say it." "If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." "To be able to think freely, a man must be certain that no consequence will follow whatever he writes." CromCruach on Blue - Aurgelmirx on Green | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
And as it so happens, unlike the Tranix camp the AFKers have to sit quite a ways away. It's almost impossible to read "must maintain a presence at a camp" and think that a bunch of dudes 5 rooms over are doing this. I like Mylez interpretation and Guk analogy the best, actually: that if a group of people are AFK in the tube room and another group comes in, they should have the chance to move to the spawn point and keep their camp. If they can't accomplish that reasonably quickly, the other group should be able to move in. | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|