Ultimate Fungi Roll Scam?

[Champion_Standing]

Originally Posted by Atalya [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Alchoholic IS Arrowed

I don't care if he scammed anyone, ban this fuck for having an immersion breaking name.

[proaero]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure people would petition if they won a fight and suddenly died afterward and also never got any loot of any kind. Not really a valid analogy at all. But since you made it, I'm pretty sure that if people took the risk in a fight against a mob and won, and that mob was supposed to be guaranteed to drop a 80-100k item, and they were locked out from looting it, that the petition forum would be on fire.

Whats you're point then? I cant have fun using rng the way I want to? If I cant then u cant do anything else u want in eq cause with no explanation, logic, reason, rationality. Im not fighting this cause because I like casino's. Players should be able to play how they want because it excites them to do so while still being with integrity. Dont we like eq classic because it was creative, FREE ROAM and e citing in ways most people these days cant comprehend. If I caant do somethind like play a casino game and win something even though the odds were incredibly horrible AND come out on top. Thus having an awsome story to tell. ( and a nice prize). If the guy would have just taken his losses and gave it. The story would go down in p99 history. And everyone would only trusted arrowed more and he probably would have gained more business. Im not completely sure what the point of a game is if it wasnt for having fun. It just seems like its not a game SOMETIMES when the people enforcing the rules create more grief than they generate good times.

[Traxan]

Originally Posted by a_gnoll_pup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They should track down this guy's main character, take his fungi from him and give it to the winner of the fungi as poetic justice. Make it happen GM team.

This

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by proaero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Whats you're point then? I cant have fun using rng the way I want to? If I cant then u cant do anything else u want in eq cause with no explanation, logic, reason, rationality. Im not fighting this cause because I like casino's. Players should be able to play how they want because it excites them to do so while still being with integrity. Dont we like eq classic because it was creative, FREE ROAM and e citing in ways most people these days cant comprehend. If I caant do somethind like play a casino game and win something even though the odds were incredibly horrible AND come out on top. Thus having an awsome story to tell. ( and a nice prize). If the guy would have just taken his losses and gave it. The story would go down in p99 history. And everyone would only trusted arrowed more and he probably would have gained more business. Im not completely sure what the point of a game is if it wasnt for having fun. It just seems like its not a game SOMETIMES when the people enforcing the rules create more grief than they generate good times.

That's the problem though. He didn't give the item that was won fair and square according to the rules that he set. That's why there are people lighting the boards up. Your rng analogy can only go so far. This is something completely player driven, therefore there will need to be moderation from the GM's from time to time. I agree that people should be allowed to run casinos and play them if they want, but both sides have to understand the risks and the consequences.

[Portasaurus]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

consequences.

Arrowed, you have until 12:00AM Eastern time to give this guy his winnings.

-Meangrocer

[indiscriminate_hater]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's the problem though. He didn't give the item that was won fair and square according to the rules that he set. That's why there are people lighting the boards up. Your rng analogy can only go so far. This is something completely player driven, therefore there will need to be moderation from the GM's from time to time. I agree that people should be allowed to run casinos and play them if they want, but both sides have to understand the risks and the consequences.

Candyland players. Anyone giving their money to someone without receiving something in the trade window understands the risks, and that includes the risk of being scammed.

[emperorsalty]

Originally Posted by Lopretni [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The real fix is for people like you to stop being so goddamn retarded so GMs can focus on shit that actually matters.

[Lictor]

Originally Posted by indiscriminate_hater [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Candyland players. Anyone giving their money to someone without receiving something in the trade window understands the risks, and that includes the risk of being scammed.

Yet people have gotten their money or items back from dropping item and logging on alt or asking someone to trade to an alt. Yes, it is shitty but if those problems were fixed in the past I do not see a difference here.

[Portasaurus]

Arrowed is Alcoholic is Pantywaist is Dungeonmaster...

...and this all upsets me greatly

RIP Dungeonmaster

DM I still love you and the super kickass DnD game.

The tunnel will be less immersive without you.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[a_gnoll_pup]

Originally Posted by Champion_Standing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't care if he scammed anyone, ban this fuck for having an immersion breaking name.

Alcohol is classic bro